All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] omap: switch to ioremap function pointer
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 13:35:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105221335.03688.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD8F177.9020809@ti.com>

On Sunday 22 May 2011 13:20:23 Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >>   /*
> >>    * Intercept ioremap() requests for addresses in our fixed mapping regions.
> >
> > The only thing that the ioremap functions for omap do as a special case
> > is to handle the fixed mappings. Maybe a better approach would be to
> > make handling this in omap (and others) unnecessary, using one of
> > two approaches:
> >
> > * Remove all fixed mappings that are also ioremapped, and rely on every
> >    user calling ioremap correctly. I don't see why we would want to allow
> >    both methods anyway.
> >
> What do you mean by "Remove all fixed mappings that are also
> ioremapped" ?

I mean don't call iotable_init() for regions that is ioremapped
into a device driver. Having both iotable_init and ioremap
on the same area is a bit fishy anyway, so we should only have one
of the two: If the ioremap specifies different attributes from
the existing mapping, the code will still just return a pointer,
which may not be what the driver asks for, although it avoids
the problems that arise from having conflicting mappings.

> Why will you ioremap() it again if the fixed mapping is already
> registered through iotable_init()

Evidently, drivers call ioremap on regions that have a mapping
installed by iotable_init, otherwise the omap_ioremap function
would not make any sense whatsoever.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-22 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-22  9:04 [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm: introduce arch_ioremap and arch_iounmap function pointer Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-22  9:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] omap: switch to ioremap " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-22  9:54   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-22 11:13     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-22 11:20     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-22 11:17       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-22 11:35       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-05-22 11:46         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-22 12:56           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-22 13:20             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-22 13:09         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-22 13:23           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-22 16:40           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-22 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm: introduce arch_ioremap and arch_iounmap " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-22 11:05   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-22 13:19     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-22 14:58       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201105221335.03688.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.