From: florian@openwrt.org (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ep93xx-eth: convert to phylib
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:15:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106060715.52332.florian@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110605.140657.1039864716002412071.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sunday 05 June 2011 23:06:57 David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:29:24 +0200
>
> > On Sunday 05 June 2011 19:57:36 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> ep93xx-eth lacked support for monitoring link status changes, with this
> >> patch, link changes are now watched and reported correctly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > I just stumbled upon: http://www.mail-
> > archive.com/netdev at vger.kernel.org/msg62549.html
> > which does not seem to have been merged.
> >
> > I will respin my patch with Herbert's changes
>
> If people wonder why things don't get merged in situations like
> this it's because there is no clear person standing up to act as
> a maintainer.
No problem here so far.
>
> Instead there are several different people submitting changes to
> this one driver and I haven't got a clue who is authoritative and
> who is not.
>
> So 9 times out of ten I'm not going to merge anything submitted
> in this way unless I start to see lots of ACKs from other developers.
>
> When it gets to the point where multiple people are touching the
> driver in all sorts of ways, there needs to be someone to do all of
> the merging and making sure the patches get applied in the right order
> and handling merge conflicts handled properly. Then they submit them
> formally here as a sane single set of patches to the list.
>
> So who is going to step up and be the ep93xx-eth maintainer? Lennert
> is listed in MAINTAINERS, but I see little to no activity from him.
Lennert, do you still have time, hardware and will to maintain that driver?
>
> The last ACK Lennert gave for a patch to this driver was in May 2010,
> more than a year ago.
--
Florian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hvr@gnu.org, kernel@wantstofly.org,
mika.westerberg@iki.fi, hsweeten@visionengravers.com,
ryan@bluewatersys.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ep93xx-eth: convert to phylib
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:15:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106060715.52332.florian@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110605.140657.1039864716002412071.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sunday 05 June 2011 23:06:57 David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:29:24 +0200
>
> > On Sunday 05 June 2011 19:57:36 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> ep93xx-eth lacked support for monitoring link status changes, with this
> >> patch, link changes are now watched and reported correctly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > I just stumbled upon: http://www.mail-
> > archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg62549.html
> > which does not seem to have been merged.
> >
> > I will respin my patch with Herbert's changes
>
> If people wonder why things don't get merged in situations like
> this it's because there is no clear person standing up to act as
> a maintainer.
No problem here so far.
>
> Instead there are several different people submitting changes to
> this one driver and I haven't got a clue who is authoritative and
> who is not.
>
> So 9 times out of ten I'm not going to merge anything submitted
> in this way unless I start to see lots of ACKs from other developers.
>
> When it gets to the point where multiple people are touching the
> driver in all sorts of ways, there needs to be someone to do all of
> the merging and making sure the patches get applied in the right order
> and handling merge conflicts handled properly. Then they submit them
> formally here as a sane single set of patches to the list.
>
> So who is going to step up and be the ep93xx-eth maintainer? Lennert
> is listed in MAINTAINERS, but I see little to no activity from him.
Lennert, do you still have time, hardware and will to maintain that driver?
>
> The last ACK Lennert gave for a patch to this driver was in May 2010,
> more than a year ago.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-05 17:57 [PATCH] ep93xx-eth: convert to phylib Florian Fainelli
2011-06-05 17:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-06-05 18:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-06-05 18:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-06-05 21:06 ` David Miller
2011-06-05 21:06 ` David Miller
2011-06-06 5:15 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2011-06-06 5:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-06-06 17:34 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2011-06-06 17:34 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2011-06-09 20:30 ` Petr Štetiar
2011-06-09 20:30 ` Petr Štetiar
2011-06-10 9:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-06-10 9:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-06-15 19:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2011-06-15 19:15 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201106060715.52332.florian@openwrt.org \
--to=florian@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.