From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com>,
lguest@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
steved@us.ibm.com, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RFC 0/4] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:08:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607160830.GB17581@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1307029008.git.mst@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:42:35PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> OK, here's a new attempt to use the new capacity api. I also added more
> comments to clarify the logic. Hope this is more readable. Let me know
> pls.
>
> This is on top of the patches applied by Rusty.
>
> Warning: untested. Posting now to give people chance to
> comment on the API.
OK, this seems to have survived some testing so far,
after I dropped patch 4 and fixed build for patch 3
(build fixup patch sent in reply to the original).
I'll be mostly offline until Sunday, would appreciate
testing reports.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git
virtio-net-xmit-polling-v2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu-kvm.git
virtio-net-event-idx-v3
Thanks!
> Changes from v1:
> - fix comment in patch 2 to correct confusion noted by Rusty
> - rewrite patch 3 along the lines suggested by Rusty
> note: it's not exactly the same but I hope it's close
> enough, the main difference is that mine does limited
> polling even in the unlikely xmit failure case.
> - added a patch to not return capacity from add_buf
> it always looked like a weird hack
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin (4):
> virtio_ring: add capacity check API
> virtio_net: fix tx capacity checks using new API
> virtio_net: limit xmit polling
> Revert "virtio: make add_buf return capacity remaining:
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 10 +++-
> include/linux/virtio.h | 7 ++-
> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.53.gc233e
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
lguest-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Shirley Ma <xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
habanero-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
Heiko Carstens
<heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
steved-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tom Lendacky
<tahm-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux390-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RFC 0/4] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:08:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607160830.GB17581@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1307029008.git.mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:42:35PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> OK, here's a new attempt to use the new capacity api. I also added more
> comments to clarify the logic. Hope this is more readable. Let me know
> pls.
>
> This is on top of the patches applied by Rusty.
>
> Warning: untested. Posting now to give people chance to
> comment on the API.
OK, this seems to have survived some testing so far,
after I dropped patch 4 and fixed build for patch 3
(build fixup patch sent in reply to the original).
I'll be mostly offline until Sunday, would appreciate
testing reports.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git
virtio-net-xmit-polling-v2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu-kvm.git
virtio-net-event-idx-v3
Thanks!
> Changes from v1:
> - fix comment in patch 2 to correct confusion noted by Rusty
> - rewrite patch 3 along the lines suggested by Rusty
> note: it's not exactly the same but I hope it's close
> enough, the main difference is that mine does limited
> polling even in the unlikely xmit failure case.
> - added a patch to not return capacity from add_buf
> it always looked like a weird hack
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin (4):
> virtio_ring: add capacity check API
> virtio_net: fix tx capacity checks using new API
> virtio_net: limit xmit polling
> Revert "virtio: make add_buf return capacity remaining:
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 10 +++-
> include/linux/virtio.h | 7 ++-
> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.53.gc233e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-07 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-02 15:42 [PATCHv2 RFC 0/4] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:42 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 1/4] virtio_ring: add capacity check API Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 2/4] virtio_net: fix tx capacity checks using new API Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 3/4] virtio_net: limit xmit polling Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 18:09 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2011-06-02 19:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 19:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 19:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 18:09 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2011-06-07 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-07 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-07 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 4/4] Revert "virtio: make add_buf return capacity remaining: Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-07 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-07 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-07 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-08 0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-08 0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-02 15:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 17:17 ` [PATCHv2 RFC 0/4] virtio and vhost-net capacity handling Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-02 17:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-06 3:39 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-06 3:39 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-06 3:39 ` Rusty Russell
2011-06-02 17:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-07 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-06-07 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-13 13:32 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-13 13:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-13 13:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-13 13:44 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:44 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:44 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-13 13:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-19 8:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-19 8:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-19 8:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-13 13:32 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-06-07 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-02 15:42 Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110607160830.GB17581@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=steved@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.