All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:19:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607171952.GA25729@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603220451.23134.47368.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>

On 06/03, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> The audit system previously expected arches calling to audit_syscall_exit to
> supply as arguments if the syscall was a success and what the return code was.
> Audit also provides a helper AUDITSC_RESULT which was supposed to simplify things
> by converting from negative retcodes to an audit internal magic value stating
> success or failure.  This helper was wrong and could indicate that a valid
> pointer returned to userspace was a failed syscall.  The fix is to fix the
> layering foolishness.  We now pass audit_syscall_exit a struct pt_reg and it
> in turns calls back into arch code to collect the return value and to
> determine if the syscall was a success or failure.  We also define a generic
> is_syscall_success() macro which determines success/failure based on if the
> value is < -MAX_ERRNO.  This works for arches like x86 which do not use a
> separate mechanism to indicate syscall failure.

I know nothing about audit, but the patch looks fine to me.


But I have a bit off-topic question,

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 8a445a0..b7b1f88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  #include <asm/ftrace.h>
>  #include <asm/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
>
>  /* Avoid __ASSEMBLER__'ifying <linux/audit.h> just for this.  */
>  #include <linux/elf-em.h>
> @@ -564,17 +565,16 @@ auditsys:
>  	jmp system_call_fastpath
>
>  	/*
> -	 * Return fast path for syscall audit.  Call audit_syscall_exit()
> +	 * Return fast path for syscall audit.  Call __audit_syscall_exit()
>  	 * directly and then jump back to the fast path with TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT
>  	 * masked off.
>  	 */
>  sysret_audit:
>  	movq RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp),%rsi	/* second arg, syscall return value */
> -	cmpq $0,%rsi		/* is it < 0? */
> -	setl %al		/* 1 if so, 0 if not */
> +	cmpq $-MAX_ERRNO,%rsi	/* is it < -MAX_ERRNO? */
> +	setbe %al		/* 1 if so, 0 if not */
>  	movzbl %al,%edi		/* zero-extend that into %edi */
> -	inc %edi /* first arg, 0->1(AUDITSC_SUCCESS), 1->2(AUDITSC_FAILURE) */
> -	call audit_syscall_exit
> +	call __audit_syscall_exit

With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
syscall_trace_leave(), no?

For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?

Oleg.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:19:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607171952.GA25729@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603220451.23134.47368.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>

On 06/03, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> The audit system previously expected arches calling to audit_syscall_exit to
> supply as arguments if the syscall was a success and what the return code was.
> Audit also provides a helper AUDITSC_RESULT which was supposed to simplify things
> by converting from negative retcodes to an audit internal magic value stating
> success or failure.  This helper was wrong and could indicate that a valid
> pointer returned to userspace was a failed syscall.  The fix is to fix the
> layering foolishness.  We now pass audit_syscall_exit a struct pt_reg and it
> in turns calls back into arch code to collect the return value and to
> determine if the syscall was a success or failure.  We also define a generic
> is_syscall_success() macro which determines success/failure based on if the
> value is < -MAX_ERRNO.  This works for arches like x86 which do not use a
> separate mechanism to indicate syscall failure.

I know nothing about audit, but the patch looks fine to me.


But I have a bit off-topic question,

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 8a445a0..b7b1f88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  #include <asm/ftrace.h>
>  #include <asm/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
>
>  /* Avoid __ASSEMBLER__'ifying <linux/audit.h> just for this.  */
>  #include <linux/elf-em.h>
> @@ -564,17 +565,16 @@ auditsys:
>  	jmp system_call_fastpath
>
>  	/*
> -	 * Return fast path for syscall audit.  Call audit_syscall_exit()
> +	 * Return fast path for syscall audit.  Call __audit_syscall_exit()
>  	 * directly and then jump back to the fast path with TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT
>  	 * masked off.
>  	 */
>  sysret_audit:
>  	movq RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp),%rsi	/* second arg, syscall return value */
> -	cmpq $0,%rsi		/* is it < 0? */
> -	setl %al		/* 1 if so, 0 if not */
> +	cmpq $-MAX_ERRNO,%rsi	/* is it < -MAX_ERRNO? */
> +	setbe %al		/* 1 if so, 0 if not */
>  	movzbl %al,%edi		/* zero-extend that into %edi */
> -	inc %edi /* first arg, 0->1(AUDITSC_SUCCESS), 1->2(AUDITSC_FAILURE) */
> -	call audit_syscall_exit
> +	call __audit_syscall_exit

With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
syscall_trace_leave(), no?

For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, jdike@addtoit.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:19:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607171952.GA25729@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603220451.23134.47368.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>

On 06/03, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> The audit system previously expected arches calling to audit_syscall_exit to
> supply as arguments if the syscall was a success and what the return code was.
> Audit also provides a helper AUDITSC_RESULT which was supposed to simplify things
> by converting from negative retcodes to an audit internal magic value stating
> success or failure.  This helper was wrong and could indicate that a valid
> pointer returned to userspace was a failed syscall.  The fix is to fix the
> layering foolishness.  We now pass audit_syscall_exit a struct pt_reg and it
> in turns calls back into arch code to collect the return value and to
> determine if the syscall was a success or failure.  We also define a generic
> is_syscall_success() macro which determines success/failure based on if the
> value is < -MAX_ERRNO.  This works for arches like x86 which do not use a
> separate mechanism to indicate syscall failure.

I know nothing about audit, but the patch looks fine to me.


But I have a bit off-topic question,

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 8a445a0..b7b1f88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  #include <asm/ftrace.h>
>  #include <asm/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
>
>  /* Avoid __ASSEMBLER__'ifying <linux/audit.h> just for this.  */
>  #include <linux/elf-em.h>
> @@ -564,17 +565,16 @@ auditsys:
>  	jmp system_call_fastpath
>
>  	/*
> -	 * Return fast path for syscall audit.  Call audit_syscall_exit()
> +	 * Return fast path for syscall audit.  Call __audit_syscall_exit()
>  	 * directly and then jump back to the fast path with TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT
>  	 * masked off.
>  	 */
>  sysret_audit:
>  	movq RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp),%rsi	/* second arg, syscall return value */
> -	cmpq $0,%rsi		/* is it < 0? */
> -	setl %al		/* 1 if so, 0 if not */
> +	cmpq $-MAX_ERRNO,%rsi	/* is it < -MAX_ERRNO? */
> +	setbe %al		/* 1 if so, 0 if not */
>  	movzbl %al,%edi		/* zero-extend that into %edi */
> -	inc %edi /* first arg, 0->1(AUDITSC_SUCCESS), 1->2(AUDITSC_FAILURE) */
> -	call audit_syscall_exit
> +	call __audit_syscall_exit

With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
syscall_trace_leave(), no?

For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?

Oleg.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-07 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-03 22:04 [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:04 ` Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:04 ` Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:04 ` Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:52 ` Tony Luck
2011-06-03 22:52   ` Tony Luck
2011-06-03 22:52   ` Tony Luck
2011-06-03 22:52   ` Tony Luck
2011-06-04 22:36 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-04 22:36   ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-04 22:36   ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-06 20:17 ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch David Miller
2011-06-06 20:17   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h David Miller
2011-06-06 20:17   ` David Miller
2011-06-07 17:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-06-07 17:19   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-07 17:19   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-07 18:53   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Eric Paris
2011-06-07 18:53     ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Eric Paris
2011-06-07 18:53     ` Eric Paris
2011-06-07 18:53     ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 16:36     ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 16:36       ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 16:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 16:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 18:13       ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:13         ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:13         ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:13         ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:37         ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 18:37           ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 18:37           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19           ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19             ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 14:04 ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Ralf Baechle
2011-06-08 14:04   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Ralf Baechle
2011-06-08 14:04   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110607171952.GA25729@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.