All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:36:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608163653.GA9592@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307472796.2052.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 06/07, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
> > if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
> > SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
> > syscall_trace_leave(), no?
> >
> > For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
> > system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
> > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?
>
> No harm is done calling twice.  The first call will do the real work and
> cleanup.  It will set a flag in the audit data that the work has been
> done (in_syscall = 0) thus the second call will then not do any real
> work and won't have anything to clean up.

Hmm... and I assume context->previous != NULL is not possible on x86_64.
OK, thanks.

And I guess, all CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL code in entry.S is only needed to
microoptimize the case when TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is the only reason for the
slow path. I wonder if it really makes the measureble difference...

Oleg.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:36:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608163653.GA9592@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307472796.2052.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 06/07, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
> > if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
> > SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
> > syscall_trace_leave(), no?
> >
> > For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
> > system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
> > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?
>
> No harm is done calling twice.  The first call will do the real work and
> cleanup.  It will set a flag in the audit data that the work has been
> done (in_syscall == 0) thus the second call will then not do any real
> work and won't have anything to clean up.

Hmm... and I assume context->previous != NULL is not possible on x86_64.
OK, thanks.

And I guess, all CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL code in entry.S is only needed to
microoptimize the case when TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is the only reason for the
slow path. I wonder if it really makes the measureble difference...

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, jdike@addtoit.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:36:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608163653.GA9592@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307472796.2052.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 06/07, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
> > if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
> > SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
> > syscall_trace_leave(), no?
> >
> > For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
> > system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
> > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?
>
> No harm is done calling twice.  The first call will do the real work and
> cleanup.  It will set a flag in the audit data that the work has been
> done (in_syscall == 0) thus the second call will then not do any real
> work and won't have anything to clean up.

Hmm... and I assume context->previous != NULL is not possible on x86_64.
OK, thanks.

And I guess, all CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL code in entry.S is only needed to
microoptimize the case when TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is the only reason for the
slow path. I wonder if it really makes the measureble difference...

Oleg.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, jdike@addtoit.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:36:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608163653.GA9592@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307472796.2052.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 06/07, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
> > if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
> > SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
> > syscall_trace_leave(), no?
> >
> > For example. The task has TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT and nothing else, it does
> > system_call->auditsys->system_call_fastpath. What if it gets, say,
> > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE before ret_from_sys_call?
>
> No harm is done calling twice.  The first call will do the real work and
> cleanup.  It will set a flag in the audit data that the work has been
> done (in_syscall == 0) thus the second call will then not do any real
> work and won't have anything to clean up.

Hmm... and I assume context->previous != NULL is not possible on x86_64.
OK, thanks.

And I guess, all CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL code in entry.S is only needed to
microoptimize the case when TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is the only reason for the
slow path. I wonder if it really makes the measureble difference...

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-08 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-03 22:04 [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:04 ` Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:04 ` Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:04 ` Eric Paris
2011-06-03 22:52 ` Tony Luck
2011-06-03 22:52   ` Tony Luck
2011-06-03 22:52   ` Tony Luck
2011-06-03 22:52   ` Tony Luck
2011-06-04 22:36 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-04 22:36   ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-04 22:36   ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-06 20:17 ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch David Miller
2011-06-06 20:17   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h David Miller
2011-06-06 20:17   ` David Miller
2011-06-07 17:19 ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-07 17:19   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-07 17:19   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-07 18:53   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Eric Paris
2011-06-07 18:53     ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Eric Paris
2011-06-07 18:53     ` Eric Paris
2011-06-07 18:53     ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 16:36     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-06-08 16:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 16:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 16:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 18:13       ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:13         ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:13         ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:13         ` Eric Paris
2011-06-08 18:37         ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 18:37           ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 18:37           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19           ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19             ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 19:19             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-08 14:04 ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch Ralf Baechle
2011-06-08 14:04   ` [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h Ralf Baechle
2011-06-08 14:04   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110608163653.GA9592@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.