All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:09:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707200949.GA25216@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707194851.GB4394@Xye>

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:18:51AM +0530, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
> * On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:24:54PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>Tested it. Works now.
> >
> >Ok, Stuck Tested-by on the patch. Hopefully Linus hasn't pulled it yet.
> Ok.
> >
> >>Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
> 
> >>Also,
> >>The condition for acpi_gsi_to_irq can be removed since it always returns zero.
> >
> >The function might in the future return something that is non-zero
> >and we should guard for it. Also you make 'irq' be unsigned which is not
> >good as the IRQ 0 is a valid value - and with making it unsigned if it is
> >set to -1 (the -1 is the invalid IRQ value) the check for 'irq != gsi'
> >will be true and and we will pass in -1 casted to unsigned. That is a
> >large value and not the right thing we want to pass to xen_register_gsi.
> 
> My rationale for the unsigned part was that acpi_gsi_to_irq always
> assigns a positive value (>= 0) to the irq passed (as unsigned
> argument). But even otherwise that shouldn't make much of difference I guess.
> 
> Also,
> I had sent another change (oneline) for the file
> arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c for check_platform_magic, looks like that has not gone into
> the pull request for Linus.

Oh, I didn't see it. Did you CC me on it? Can you bounce it to me please?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-07 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-03 23:25 [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04  8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04  8:49   ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04 22:16   ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04 22:16   ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:13       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:27       ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:48           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-06  8:30             ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-07-06  8:30             ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-07 15:46             ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 15:46             ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 16:24               ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 16:24               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 16:24                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 19:48                 ` [Xen-devel] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 19:48                 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 20:09                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 20:09                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-07-07 21:04                     ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 21:04                     ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-08 20:26                       ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix (for platform-pci-unplug.c) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-09 16:29                         ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 16:29                         ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-11 10:47                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-11 10:47                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-08 20:26                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:27       ` [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-04  8:49 ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110707200949.GA25216@dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rprabhu@wnohang.net \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.