From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:24:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707162454.GA8164@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707154648.GA4394@Xye>
> Tested it. Works now.
Ok, Stuck Tested-by on the patch. Hopefully Linus hasn't pulled it yet.
> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
>
> Also,
> The condition for acpi_gsi_to_irq can be removed since it always returns zero.
The function might in the future return something that is non-zero
and we should guard for it. Also you make 'irq' be unsigned which is not
good as the IRQ 0 is a valid value - and with making it unsigned if it is
set to -1 (the -1 is the invalid IRQ value) the check for 'irq != gsi'
will be true and and we will pass in -1 casted to unsigned. That is a
large value and not the right thing we want to pass to xen_register_gsi.
> ============================================
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> index f567965..3faa55b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
> int rc;
> int trigger, polarity;
> int gsi = acpi_sci_override_gsi;
> - int irq = -1;
> + unsigned int irq = 0u;
> int gsi_override = -1;
>
> if (!gsi)
> @@ -435,11 +435,10 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
> * setup as we had setup IRQ 20 for it).
> */
> /* Check whether the GSI != IRQ */
> - if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq) == 0) {
> - if (irq >= 0 && irq != gsi)
> - /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
> - gsi_override = irq;
> - }
> + acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq);
> + if (irq != gsi)
> + /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
> + gsi_override = irq;
>
> gsi = xen_register_gsi(gsi, gsi_override, trigger, polarity);
> printk(KERN_INFO "xen: acpi sci %d\n", gsi);
>
>
> --------------------------
> Raghavendra Prabhu
> GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
> Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
> www: wnohang.net
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:24:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707162454.GA8164@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707154648.GA4394@Xye>
> Tested it. Works now.
Ok, Stuck Tested-by on the patch. Hopefully Linus hasn't pulled it yet.
> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
>
> Also,
> The condition for acpi_gsi_to_irq can be removed since it always returns zero.
The function might in the future return something that is non-zero
and we should guard for it. Also you make 'irq' be unsigned which is not
good as the IRQ 0 is a valid value - and with making it unsigned if it is
set to -1 (the -1 is the invalid IRQ value) the check for 'irq != gsi'
will be true and and we will pass in -1 casted to unsigned. That is a
large value and not the right thing we want to pass to xen_register_gsi.
> ============================================
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> index f567965..3faa55b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
> int rc;
> int trigger, polarity;
> int gsi = acpi_sci_override_gsi;
> - int irq = -1;
> + unsigned int irq = 0u;
> int gsi_override = -1;
>
> if (!gsi)
> @@ -435,11 +435,10 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
> * setup as we had setup IRQ 20 for it).
> */
> /* Check whether the GSI != IRQ */
> - if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq) == 0) {
> - if (irq >= 0 && irq != gsi)
> - /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
> - gsi_override = irq;
> - }
> + acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq);
> + if (irq != gsi)
> + /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
> + gsi_override = irq;
>
> gsi = xen_register_gsi(gsi, gsi_override, trigger, polarity);
> printk(KERN_INFO "xen: acpi sci %d\n", gsi);
>
>
> --------------------------
> Raghavendra Prabhu
> GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
> Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
> www: wnohang.net
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-03 23:25 [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04 22:16 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:27 ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-06 8:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-07-06 8:30 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-07 15:46 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 15:46 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 16:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-07-07 16:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 19:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 20:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 21:04 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 21:04 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-08 20:26 ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix (for platform-pci-unplug.c) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-08 20:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-09 16:29 ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 16:29 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-11 10:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-11 10:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-07 20:09 ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 19:48 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 16:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:27 ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04 22:16 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110707162454.GA8164@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rprabhu@wnohang.net \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.