All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110705144846.GA13548@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110705142731.GA4463@Xye>

> >>xen_register_gsi and hence, xen_register_pirq are called from
> >>init (with xen_setup_acpi_sci) and non-init (with
> >>acpi_register_gsi_xen); since xen_set_acpi_sci calls it with gsi ==
> >>acpi_sci_override_gsi and is marked __init, the best way would be to
> >>call xen_register_gsi and xen_register_pirq with a boolean argument like
> >>sci_override to obviate the need to use acpi_sci_override_gsi in
> >>register_pirq. I will send the patch with this change if it looks good.
> >
> >Hold on, let me rebase #stable/pci.cleanups and see if the issue
> >here disappears.
> Thanks, will wait until the rebase and test after that.

Hm, it actually looks like it wont do the trick. Why don't you send
a patch against 3.0-rc6 with the outlined mechanism mentioned above.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110705144846.GA13548@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110705142731.GA4463@Xye>

> >>xen_register_gsi and hence, xen_register_pirq are called from
> >>init (with xen_setup_acpi_sci) and non-init (with
> >>acpi_register_gsi_xen); since xen_set_acpi_sci calls it with gsi ==
> >>acpi_sci_override_gsi and is marked __init, the best way would be to
> >>call xen_register_gsi and xen_register_pirq with a boolean argument like
> >>sci_override to obviate the need to use acpi_sci_override_gsi in
> >>register_pirq. I will send the patch with this change if it looks good.
> >
> >Hold on, let me rebase #stable/pci.cleanups and see if the issue
> >here disappears.
> Thanks, will wait until the rebase and test after that.

Hm, it actually looks like it wont do the trick. Why don't you send
a patch against 3.0-rc6 with the outlined mechanism mentioned above.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-05 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-03 23:25 [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04  8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04  8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04  8:49   ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04 22:16   ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:13       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:27       ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:27       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-07-05 14:48           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-06  8:30             ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-07-06  8:30             ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-07 15:46             ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 15:46             ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 16:24               ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 16:24                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 19:48                 ` [Xen-devel] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 19:48                 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 20:09                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 21:04                     ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-08 20:26                       ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix (for platform-pci-unplug.c) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-09 16:29                         ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 16:29                         ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-11 10:47                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-11 10:47                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-08 20:26                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 21:04                     ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 20:09                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 16:24               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32           ` [TOME] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-04 22:16   ` Raghavendra D Prabhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110705144846.GA13548@dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rprabhu@wnohang.net \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.