From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/readahead: Move the check for ra_pages after VM_SequentialReadHint()
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:53:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110709205308.GC17463@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <323ddfc402a7f7b94f0cb02bba15acb2acca786f.1310239575.git.rprabhu@wnohang.net>
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 03:41:20AM +0800, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
> page_cache_sync_readahead checks for ra->ra_pages again, so moving the check after VM_SequentialReadHint.
NAK. This patch adds nothing but overheads.
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
> if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
> return;
> - if (!ra->ra_pages)
> - return;
>
> if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)) {
> page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset,
> @@ -1575,6 +1573,9 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!ra->ra_pages)
> + return;
> +
page_cache_sync_readahead() has the same
if (!ra->ra_pages)
return;
So the patch adds the call into page_cache_sync_readahead() just to return..
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/readahead: Move the check for ra_pages after VM_SequentialReadHint()
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:53:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110709205308.GC17463@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <323ddfc402a7f7b94f0cb02bba15acb2acca786f.1310239575.git.rprabhu@wnohang.net>
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 03:41:20AM +0800, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
> page_cache_sync_readahead checks for ra->ra_pages again, so moving the check after VM_SequentialReadHint.
NAK. This patch adds nothing but overheads.
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
> if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
> return;
> - if (!ra->ra_pages)
> - return;
>
> if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)) {
> page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset,
> @@ -1575,6 +1573,9 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!ra->ra_pages)
> + return;
> +
page_cache_sync_readahead() has the same
if (!ra->ra_pages)
return;
So the patch adds the call into page_cache_sync_readahead() just to return..
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-09 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-09 19:41 [PATCH 0/3] Readahead fixes Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 19:41 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/readahead: Change the check for PageReadahead into an else-if Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 19:41 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 20:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-09 20:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/readahead: Remove file_ra_state from arguments of count_history_pages Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 19:41 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 20:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-09 20:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/readahead: Move the check for ra_pages after VM_SequentialReadHint() Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 19:41 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-09 20:53 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-07-09 20:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-10 12:59 ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-10 15:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-10 15:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-11 23:02 ` Re. Revised [PATCH 3/3] mm/readahead: Remove the check for ra->ra_pages Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-11 23:02 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-12 18:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-12 18:09 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110709205308.GC17463@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com \
--cc=rprabhu@wnohang.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.