From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>,
"Pohlack, Martin" <Martin.Pohlack@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:06:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725200645.GC8302@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110725200014.GA23986@aftab>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org> wrote:
> So yeah, the simpler fix works for processes mapping libraries in
> the same order but not for processes mapping a subset of libraries
> in a different order.
but what is the proportion of 'good' versus bad alignment of
libraries, could you collect some stats on a representative enough,
fully booted up Linux system?
Are only 1% of mappings 'bad'? 5%? 10%? 50%? We have no idea and the
actual number matters a lot.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 13:15 [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 16:16 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-26 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-24 17:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-24 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 18:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 19:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 20:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-25 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-25 21:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 5:58 ` Ray Lee
2011-07-26 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-26 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-26 19:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 17:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-28 14:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 14:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-28 14:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 14:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 17:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-26 18:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 18:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 19:42 ` Andre Przywara
2011-07-26 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-27 4:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 6:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-27 9:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 15:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 15:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 15:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 15:57 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 16:42 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110725200645.GC8302@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@amd.com \
--cc=Martin.Pohlack@amd.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.