All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
	"Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Pohlack, Martin" <Martin.Pohlack@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:37:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727153731.GA19477@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E2FDAD0.8000809@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:30:56AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 09:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > >  Yeah, actually the idea is to patch the kernel only this one time
> > >  and never ever be needing to do this for future CPUs, for this
> > >  matter.
> >
> > But the check you have added turns this workaround on for all family
> > 0x15 CPUs. If a family 0x15 CPU is built with a larger or more
> > associative cache, one that does not need the workaround, we would
> > still turn on the workaround.
> 
> Similarly, if family 0x21 CPUs have a similar arrangement (with 
> identical or different cache sizes and associativity) the hardcoded 
> check will fail.

So, in short, I$ design is the same for all F15h processors so a family
0x15 check suffices here.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-27 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-22 13:15 [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 13:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 13:47     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 16:16     ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-26 18:33     ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-24 17:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 17:39     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-24 18:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 18:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 18:30         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 19:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 20:44             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 20:00               ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-25 20:06                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 21:53                   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26  5:58                     ` Ray Lee
2011-07-26 17:28                       ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:34                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-26 18:39                           ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:47                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-26 19:33                               ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 17:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 17:16         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 13:44           ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-28 14:02             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 14:13               ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-28 14:18                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 14:35                   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 17:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-26 18:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:16     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 18:37       ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:38         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 19:42           ` Andre Przywara
2011-07-26 22:34             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-27  4:14             ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27  6:21               ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27  6:59                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-27  9:30                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 15:37                     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-07-27 15:45                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 15:49                         ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 15:57                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 16:42                             ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110727153731.GA19477@aftab \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=Andre.Przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=Martin.Pohlack@amd.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.