* [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
@ 2011-08-11 6:58 Kyungmin Park
2011-08-11 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyungmin Park @ 2011-08-11 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The following changes since commit 322a8b034003c0d46d39af85bf24fee27b902f48:
Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
Kyungmin Park (2):
ARM: exynos4: universal: Use the correct regulator names
ARM: exynos4: Use nr_irqs instead of NR_IRQS
Marek Szyprowski (5):
ARM: Exynos4: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to eint code
ARM: Samsung: Add chained enrty/exit call to timer interrupt handler
ARM: S5P: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to gpio-int code
ARM: Exynos4: use s5p-timer for UniversalC210 board
ARM: Samsung: fix watchdog reset issue with clk_get()
Sylwester Nawrocki (1):
ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix the IRQ definitions for MIPI CSIS device
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 3 +++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/irqs.h | 5 ++---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-combiner.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-eint.c | 7 +++++++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c | 8 +++++---
arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/clock.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-s3c2443/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c | 2 ++
arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/s3c2410-clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 6 ++++++
arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h | 2 ++
.../arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/watchdog-reset.h | 10 +++-------
arch/arm/plat-samsung/irq-vic-timer.c | 5 +++++
19 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
2011-08-11 6:58 [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1 Kyungmin Park
@ 2011-08-11 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-12 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-08-11 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> The following changes since commit
> 322a8b034003c0d46d39af85bf24fee27b902f48:
>
> Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
>
> Kyungmin Park (2):
> ARM: exynos4: universal: Use the correct regulator names
> ARM: exynos4: Use nr_irqs instead of NR_IRQS
>
> Marek Szyprowski (5):
> ARM: Exynos4: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to eint code
> ARM: Samsung: Add chained enrty/exit call to timer interrupt handler
> ARM: S5P: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to gpio-int code
> ARM: Exynos4: use s5p-timer for UniversalC210 board
> ARM: Samsung: fix watchdog reset issue with clk_get()
>
> Sylwester Nawrocki (1):
> ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix the IRQ definitions for MIPI CSIS device
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 3 +++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/irqs.h | 5 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-combiner.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-eint.c | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c | 8 +++++---
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/clock.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2443/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/s3c2410-clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h | 2 ++
> .../arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/watchdog-reset.h | 10 +++-------
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/irq-vic-timer.c | 5 +++++
> 19 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you.
Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture
maintainer.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
2011-08-11 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2011-08-12 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-13 4:04 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-08-12 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
> >
> No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you.
>
> Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture
> maintainer.
I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
from you.
Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
* Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
so that they can get identified for backports.
* Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
* Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
2011-08-12 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-08-13 4:04 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-17 5:54 ` Kyungmin Park
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-08-13 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
> > >
>
> > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
you.
> >
> > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
architecture
> > maintainer.
>
> I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
> from you.
>
> Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
> they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
> fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
>
> * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
> so that they can get identified for backports.
>
> * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
>
> * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
>
OK, I see.
As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
2011-08-13 4:04 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2011-08-17 5:54 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-08-19 5:24 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyungmin Park @ 2011-08-17 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> > > ? Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
>> > >
>> > > are available in the git repository at:
>> > > ? git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
>> > >
>>
>> > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
> you.
>> >
>> > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
> architecture
>> > maintainer.
>>
>> I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
>> from you.
>>
>> Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
>> they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
>> fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
>>
>> * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
>> so that they can get identified for backports.
>>
>> * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
>>
>> * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
>>
> OK, I see.
>
> As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.
Do you need more time?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
2011-08-17 5:54 ` Kyungmin Park
@ 2011-08-19 5:24 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-08-19 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> > > ? Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
> >> > >
> >> > > are available in the git repository at:
> >> > > ? git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
> >> > >
> >>
> >> > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
> > you.
> >> >
> >> > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
> > architecture
> >> > maintainer.
> >>
> >> I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
> >> from you.
> >>
> >> Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear
why
> >> they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the
bug
> >> fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
> >>
> >> * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc:
stable at kernel.org'
> >> so that they can get identified for backports.
> >>
> >> * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
> >>
> >> * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
> >>
> > OK, I see.
> >
> > As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.
>
> Do you need more time?
I will send before Arnd's sending for -rc3..maybe late tonight (KST).
Now I need to sort out current samsung-fixes...
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-19 5:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-11 6:58 [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1 Kyungmin Park
2011-08-11 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-12 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-13 4:04 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-17 5:54 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-08-19 5:24 ` Kukjin Kim
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.