From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@freescale.com>,
socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
PPC list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] flexcan: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:25:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110815152540.GP4926@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6vafc6mYyKCAO+HqkRPsZ3GmeVJnK+z8=BX_wQQMG4LmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> wrote:
> > Grant,
> >
> > Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> > property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
> > more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
> > the flexcan implementations.
>
> If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the
> fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan". Marketing may say
> flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things.
> Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to
> problems in the future.
Thanks,
Robin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala
<galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] flexcan: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:25:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110815152540.GP4926@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6vafc6mYyKCAO+HqkRPsZ3GmeVJnK+z8=BX_wQQMG4LmQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Grant,
> >
> > Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> > property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
> > more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
> > the flexcan implementations.
>
> If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the
> fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan". Marketing may say
> flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things.
> Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to
> problems in the future.
Thanks,
Robin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-12 8:45 [PATCH v12 0/6] flexcan/powerpc: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010) Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] flexcan: Remove #include <mach/clock.h> Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] flexcan: Abstract off read/write for big/little endian Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] flexcan: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-15 15:03 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-15 15:03 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-15 15:13 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-15 15:13 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-15 15:25 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2011-08-15 15:25 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-15 16:13 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2011-08-15 16:13 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2011-08-12 8:45 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] flexcan: Add of_match to platform_device definition Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] flexcan: Prefer device tree clock frequency if available Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-12 12:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-08-12 12:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-08-12 8:45 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] powerpc: Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb Robin Holt
2011-08-12 8:45 ` Robin Holt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110815152540.GP4926@sgi.com \
--to=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=B22300@freescale.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.