All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] compaction accouting fix
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:37:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110831113710.GC17512@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <282a4531f23c5e35cfddf089f93559130b4bb660.1321112552.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:37:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> I saw the following accouting of compaction during test of the series.
> 
> compact_blocks_moved 251
> compact_pages_moved 44
> 
> It's very awkward to me although it's possbile because it means we try to compact 251 blocks
> but it just migrated 44 pages. As further investigation, I found isolate_migratepages doesn't
> isolate any pages but it returns ISOLATE_SUCCESS and then, it just increases compact_blocks_moved
> but doesn't increased compact_pages_moved.
> 
> This patch makes accouting of compaction works only in case of success of isolation.
> 
> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
> CC: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>

It's a teensy-bit awkward that isolate_migratepages() can return
success without actually isolating any new pages, just because there
are still some pages left from a previous run (cc->nr_migratepages is
maintained across isolation calls).

Maybe isolate_migratepages() should just return an error if compaction
should really be aborted and 0 otherwise, and have compact_zone()
always check for cc->nr_migratepages itself?

	if (isolate_migratepages(zone, cc) < 0) {
		ret = COMPACT_PARTIAL;
		goto out;
	}

	if (!cc->nr_migratepages)
		continue;

	...

Just a nit-pick, though.  If you don't agree, just leave it as is.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] compaction accouting fix
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:37:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110831113710.GC17512@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <282a4531f23c5e35cfddf089f93559130b4bb660.1321112552.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:37:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> I saw the following accouting of compaction during test of the series.
> 
> compact_blocks_moved 251
> compact_pages_moved 44
> 
> It's very awkward to me although it's possbile because it means we try to compact 251 blocks
> but it just migrated 44 pages. As further investigation, I found isolate_migratepages doesn't
> isolate any pages but it returns ISOLATE_SUCCESS and then, it just increases compact_blocks_moved
> but doesn't increased compact_pages_moved.
> 
> This patch makes accouting of compaction works only in case of success of isolation.
> 
> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
> CC: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>

It's a teensy-bit awkward that isolate_migratepages() can return
success without actually isolating any new pages, just because there
are still some pages left from a previous run (cc->nr_migratepages is
maintained across isolation calls).

Maybe isolate_migratepages() should just return an error if compaction
should really be aborted and 0 otherwise, and have compact_zone()
always check for cc->nr_migratepages itself?

	if (isolate_migratepages(zone, cc) < 0) {
		ret = COMPACT_PARTIAL;
		goto out;
	}

	if (!cc->nr_migratepages)
		continue;

	...

Just a nit-pick, though.  If you don't agree, just leave it as is.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-12 16:37 [PATCH 0/3] Fix compaction about mlocked pages Minchan Kim
2011-11-12 16:37 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] compaction accouting fix Minchan Kim
2011-08-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] Correct isolate_mode_t bitwise type Minchan Kim
2011-08-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] compaction: compact unevictable page Minchan Kim
2011-10-06 21:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix compaction about mlocked pages Andrew Morton
2011-10-06 21:54   ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-06 23:07   ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-06 23:07     ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-12 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] Correct isolate_mode_t bitwise type Minchan Kim
2011-11-12 16:37   ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-30 17:51   ` Rik van Riel
2011-08-30 17:51     ` Rik van Riel
2011-08-31 11:13   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 11:13     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-01 13:05   ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-01 13:05     ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-02  3:29     ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-02  3:29       ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-12 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] compaction: compact unevictable page Minchan Kim
2011-11-12 16:37   ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31  1:09   ` Rik van Riel
2011-08-31  1:09     ` Rik van Riel
2011-08-31 11:19   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 11:19     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 14:41     ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31 14:41       ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-01 14:02       ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-01 14:02         ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-02  4:48         ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-02  4:48           ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-02 13:34           ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-02 13:34             ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-12 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] compaction accouting fix Minchan Kim
2011-11-12 16:37   ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-08-31 11:37     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 14:56     ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31 14:56       ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31 15:03       ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 15:03         ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-01 14:20   ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-01 14:20     ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-02  5:09     ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-02  5:09       ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-02 13:36       ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-02 13:36         ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110831113710.GC17512@redhat.com \
    --to=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.