From: phil.sutter@viprinet.com (Phil Sutter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] af_packet: flush complete kernel cache in packet_sendmsg
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:59:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902135954.GA29025@philter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314971179.3092.159.camel@deadeye>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 13:08 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > This flushes the cache before and after accessing the mmapped packet
> > buffer. It seems like the call to flush_dcache_page from inside
> > __packet_get_status is not enough on Kirkwood (or ARM in general).
> > ---
> > I know this is far from an optimal solution, but it's in fact the only working
> > one I found.
> [...]
>
> This is ridiculous. If flush_dcache_page() isn't doing everything it
> should, you need to fix that.
You're absolutely correct. But in fact this problem goes way too deep
for me to find it's cause. And since my time is finite, I doubt this
will change in the near future. So I asked for help, a pointer in
whatever direction or anything I could try to help further analyzing -
without any response (unless I missed it, in which case I apologize).
Please don't get me wrong. I have no intend in this patch becoming
mainline, just want to give others with the same problem a starting
point.
Greetings, Phil
--
Viprinet GmbH
Mainzer Str. 43
55411 Bingen am Rhein
Germany
Zentrale: +49-6721-49030-0
Durchwahl: +49-6721-49030-134
Fax: +49-6721-49030-209
phil.sutter at viprinet.com
http://www.viprinet.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bingen am Rhein
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB40380
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Simon Kissel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Phil Sutter <phil.sutter@viprinet.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: flush complete kernel cache in packet_sendmsg
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:59:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902135954.GA29025@philter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314971179.3092.159.camel@deadeye>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 13:08 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > This flushes the cache before and after accessing the mmapped packet
> > buffer. It seems like the call to flush_dcache_page from inside
> > __packet_get_status is not enough on Kirkwood (or ARM in general).
> > ---
> > I know this is far from an optimal solution, but it's in fact the only working
> > one I found.
> [...]
>
> This is ridiculous. If flush_dcache_page() isn't doing everything it
> should, you need to fix that.
You're absolutely correct. But in fact this problem goes way too deep
for me to find it's cause. And since my time is finite, I doubt this
will change in the near future. So I asked for help, a pointer in
whatever direction or anything I could try to help further analyzing -
without any response (unless I missed it, in which case I apologize).
Please don't get me wrong. I have no intend in this patch becoming
mainline, just want to give others with the same problem a starting
point.
Greetings, Phil
--
Viprinet GmbH
Mainzer Str. 43
55411 Bingen am Rhein
Germany
Zentrale: +49-6721-49030-0
Durchwahl: +49-6721-49030-134
Fax: +49-6721-49030-209
phil.sutter@viprinet.com
http://www.viprinet.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bingen am Rhein
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB40380
Geschäftsführer: Simon Kissel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-02 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-08 13:06 ARM, AF_PACKET: caching problems on Marvell Kirkwood Phil Sutter
2011-04-08 13:06 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-05 14:11 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-05 14:11 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-05 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-05 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-06 16:12 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-06 16:12 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-05 19:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2011-05-05 19:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2011-05-06 16:17 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-06 16:17 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-09 8:59 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-09 8:59 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-25 10:32 ` Phil Sutter
2011-05-25 10:32 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-02 11:08 ` [PATCH] af_packet: flush complete kernel cache in packet_sendmsg Phil Sutter
2011-09-02 11:08 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-02 13:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-09-02 13:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-09-02 13:59 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2011-09-02 13:59 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-02 17:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-02 17:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-05 19:57 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-05 19:57 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-06 9:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-06 9:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-06 11:05 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-06 11:05 ` Phil Sutter
[not found] ` <D3F292ADF945FB49B35E96C94C2061B90A239361@nsmail.netscout.com>
2011-09-02 14:00 ` FW: " chetan loke
2011-09-02 14:00 ` chetan loke
2011-09-02 15:31 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-02 15:31 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-02 16:49 ` chetan loke
2011-09-02 16:49 ` chetan loke
2011-09-06 9:44 ` Phil Sutter
2011-09-06 9:44 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110902135954.GA29025@philter \
--to=phil.sutter@viprinet.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.