From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:53:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110904020916.070059502@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110904015305.367445271@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: blk-queue-underrun.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4129 bytes --]
Hurry it up when there are less than 3 async requests in the block io queue:
1) don't dirty throttle the current dirtier
2) wakeup the flusher for background writeout (XXX: the flusher may then
abort not being aware of the underrun)
When doing 1-dd write test with dirty_bytes=1MB, it increased the XFS
writeout throughput from 5MB/s to 55MB/s and increased disk utilization
from ~3% to ~85%. ext4 achieves almost the same. However btrfs is not
good: it only does 1MB/s normally, with sudden rushes to 10-60MB/s.
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
CC: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 14:41:38.000000000 +0800
@@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static void __freed_request(struct reque
{
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
+ if (rl->count[sync] <= q->in_flight[sync] &&
+ rl->count[!sync] == 0)
+ blk_set_queue_underrun(q, sync);
+
if (rl->count[sync] < queue_congestion_off_threshold(q))
blk_clear_queue_congested(q, sync);
@@ -738,6 +742,9 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
if (rl->count[is_sync] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2))
goto out;
+ if (rl->count[is_sync] >= q->in_flight[is_sync] + BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS)
+ blk_clear_queue_underrun(q, is_sync);
+
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -699,6 +699,18 @@ static inline void blk_set_queue_congest
set_bdi_congested(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
}
+#define BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS 3
+
+static inline void blk_clear_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ clear_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
+static inline void blk_set_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ set_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
extern void blk_start_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_stop_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_sync_queue(struct request_queue *q);
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ enum bdi_state {
BDI_sync_congested, /* The sync queue is getting full */
BDI_registered, /* bdi_register() was done */
BDI_writeback_running, /* Writeback is in progress */
+ BDI_async_underrun, /* The async queue is getting underrun */
BDI_unused, /* Available bits start here */
};
@@ -301,6 +302,23 @@ void set_bdi_congested(struct backing_de
long congestion_wait(int sync, long timeout);
long wait_iff_congested(struct zone *zone, int sync, long timeout);
+static inline void clear_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ clear_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline void set_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ set_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline int bdi_async_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+ return bdi->state & (1 << BDI_async_underrun);
+}
+
static inline bool bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
return !(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK);
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 14:40:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -1067,6 +1067,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
start_time);
+ if (unlikely(!dirty_exceeded && bdi_async_underrun(bdi)))
+ break;
+
dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
background_thresh, nr_dirty,
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:53:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110904020916.070059502@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110904015305.367445271@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: blk-queue-underrun.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4432 bytes --]
Hurry it up when there are less than 3 async requests in the block io queue:
1) don't dirty throttle the current dirtier
2) wakeup the flusher for background writeout (XXX: the flusher may then
abort not being aware of the underrun)
When doing 1-dd write test with dirty_bytes=1MB, it increased the XFS
writeout throughput from 5MB/s to 55MB/s and increased disk utilization
from ~3% to ~85%. ext4 achieves almost the same. However btrfs is not
good: it only does 1MB/s normally, with sudden rushes to 10-60MB/s.
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
CC: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 14:41:38.000000000 +0800
@@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static void __freed_request(struct reque
{
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
+ if (rl->count[sync] <= q->in_flight[sync] &&
+ rl->count[!sync] == 0)
+ blk_set_queue_underrun(q, sync);
+
if (rl->count[sync] < queue_congestion_off_threshold(q))
blk_clear_queue_congested(q, sync);
@@ -738,6 +742,9 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
if (rl->count[is_sync] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2))
goto out;
+ if (rl->count[is_sync] >= q->in_flight[is_sync] + BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS)
+ blk_clear_queue_underrun(q, is_sync);
+
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -699,6 +699,18 @@ static inline void blk_set_queue_congest
set_bdi_congested(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
}
+#define BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS 3
+
+static inline void blk_clear_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ clear_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
+static inline void blk_set_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ set_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
extern void blk_start_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_stop_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_sync_queue(struct request_queue *q);
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ enum bdi_state {
BDI_sync_congested, /* The sync queue is getting full */
BDI_registered, /* bdi_register() was done */
BDI_writeback_running, /* Writeback is in progress */
+ BDI_async_underrun, /* The async queue is getting underrun */
BDI_unused, /* Available bits start here */
};
@@ -301,6 +302,23 @@ void set_bdi_congested(struct backing_de
long congestion_wait(int sync, long timeout);
long wait_iff_congested(struct zone *zone, int sync, long timeout);
+static inline void clear_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ clear_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline void set_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ set_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline int bdi_async_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+ return bdi->state & (1 << BDI_async_underrun);
+}
+
static inline bool bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
return !(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK);
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 14:40:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -1067,6 +1067,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
start_time);
+ if (unlikely(!dirty_exceeded && bdi_async_underrun(bdi)))
+ break;
+
dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
background_thresh, nr_dirty,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:53:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110904020916.070059502@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110904015305.367445271@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: blk-queue-underrun.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4432 bytes --]
Hurry it up when there are less than 3 async requests in the block io queue:
1) don't dirty throttle the current dirtier
2) wakeup the flusher for background writeout (XXX: the flusher may then
abort not being aware of the underrun)
When doing 1-dd write test with dirty_bytes=1MB, it increased the XFS
writeout throughput from 5MB/s to 55MB/s and increased disk utilization
from ~3% to ~85%. ext4 achieves almost the same. However btrfs is not
good: it only does 1MB/s normally, with sudden rushes to 10-60MB/s.
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
CC: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 14:41:38.000000000 +0800
@@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static void __freed_request(struct reque
{
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
+ if (rl->count[sync] <= q->in_flight[sync] &&
+ rl->count[!sync] == 0)
+ blk_set_queue_underrun(q, sync);
+
if (rl->count[sync] < queue_congestion_off_threshold(q))
blk_clear_queue_congested(q, sync);
@@ -738,6 +742,9 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
if (rl->count[is_sync] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2))
goto out;
+ if (rl->count[is_sync] >= q->in_flight[is_sync] + BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS)
+ blk_clear_queue_underrun(q, is_sync);
+
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -699,6 +699,18 @@ static inline void blk_set_queue_congest
set_bdi_congested(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
}
+#define BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS 3
+
+static inline void blk_clear_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ clear_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
+static inline void blk_set_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ set_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
extern void blk_start_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_stop_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_sync_queue(struct request_queue *q);
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ enum bdi_state {
BDI_sync_congested, /* The sync queue is getting full */
BDI_registered, /* bdi_register() was done */
BDI_writeback_running, /* Writeback is in progress */
+ BDI_async_underrun, /* The async queue is getting underrun */
BDI_unused, /* Available bits start here */
};
@@ -301,6 +302,23 @@ void set_bdi_congested(struct backing_de
long congestion_wait(int sync, long timeout);
long wait_iff_congested(struct zone *zone, int sync, long timeout);
+static inline void clear_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ clear_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline void set_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ set_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline int bdi_async_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+ return bdi->state & (1 << BDI_async_underrun);
+}
+
static inline bool bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
return !(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK);
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 14:40:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -1067,6 +1067,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
start_time);
+ if (unlikely(!dirty_exceeded && bdi_async_underrun(bdi)))
+ break;
+
dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
background_thresh, nr_dirty,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-04 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 160+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 1:53 [PATCH 00/18] IO-less dirty throttling v11 Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 01/18] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 02/18] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-05 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-05 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-05 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-05 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 18:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-06 18:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-08 2:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-08 2:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-12 5:44 ` Nai Xia
2011-11-12 5:44 ` Nai Xia
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 03/18] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 04/18] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 23:27 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:27 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:34 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:34 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 1:04 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 1:04 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 11:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 11:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 06/18] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 2:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 07/18] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 08/18] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 09/18] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 10/18] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 12:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 12:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-18 14:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 14:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 3:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 3:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 11:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 12:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 2:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 12/18] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 13/18] writeback: limit max dirty pause time Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 2:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-18 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 14/18] writeback: control " Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 2:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 15/18] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 9:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 9:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 0:17 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 0:17 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 9:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 16/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 17/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 0:22 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 0:22 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 1:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 16:42 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 16:42 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-08 8:51 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-09-08 8:51 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 18/18] btrfs: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 00/18] IO-less dirty throttling v11 Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 13:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 19:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-07 19:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-28 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-29 4:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 4:11 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110904020916.070059502@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.