All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: agk@sourceware.org <agk@sourceware.org>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: LVM2/libdm/ioctl libdm-iface.c
Date: 23 Sep 2011 17:16:29 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110923171629.21970.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)

CVSROOT:	/cvs/lvm2
Module name:	LVM2
Changes by:	agk at sourceware.org	2011-09-23 17:16:28

Modified files:
	libdm/ioctl    : libdm-iface.c 

Log message:
	explain why we may now retry

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.122&r2=1.123

--- LVM2/libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c	2011/09/22 17:59:58	1.122
+++ LVM2/libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c	2011/09/23 17:16:28	1.123
@@ -1654,6 +1654,11 @@
 					  _cmd_data_v4[dmt->type].name,
 					  strerror(errno));
 
+			/*
+			 * It's sometimes worth retrying after EBUSY in case
+			 * it's a transient failure caused by an asynchronous
+			 * process quickly scanning the device.
+			 */
 			*retryable = errno == EBUSY;
 
 			_dm_zfree_dmi(dmi);
@@ -1739,6 +1744,12 @@
 repeat_ioctl:
 	if (!(dmi = _do_dm_ioctl(dmt, command, _ioctl_buffer_double_factor,
 				 ioctl_retry, &retryable))) {
+		/*
+		 * Async udev rules that scan devices commonly cause transient
+		 * failures.  Normally you'd expect the user to have made sure
+		 * nothing was using the device before issuing REMOVE, so it's
+		 * worth retrying in case the failure is indeed transient.
+		 */
 		if (retryable && dmt->type == DM_DEVICE_REMOVE &&
 		    dmt->retry_remove && ++ioctl_retry <= DM_IOCTL_RETRIES) {
 			usleep(DM_RETRY_USLEEP_DELAY);



             reply	other threads:[~2011-09-23 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-23 17:16 agk [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-05 14:45 LVM2/libdm/ioctl libdm-iface.c prajnoha
2012-03-01 10:46 zkabelac
2011-11-08 19:02 snitzer
2011-10-17 14:36 zkabelac
2011-09-22 18:00 prajnoha
2011-08-19 16:49 agk
2011-06-29 16:08 agk
2011-06-29 11:36 agk
2011-06-29  8:54 agk
2011-06-13  3:53 agk
2011-03-20  2:00 agk
2011-03-20 13:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-20 21:41   ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-03-20 23:51     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-21  1:47       ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-03-05 21:17 mbroz
2011-03-06  1:18 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-03-06  1:36   ` Milan Broz
2011-03-06  1:51     ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-03-02  8:41 zkabelac
2011-02-04 21:26 agk
2011-01-31 11:54 prajnoha
2010-11-30 22:32 zkabelac
2010-08-16 11:13 prajnoha
2010-07-28 10:30 prajnoha
2010-05-03 22:08 prajnoha
2009-08-06 15:02 prajnoha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110923171629.21970.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=agk@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.