From: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>
To: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dilan Lee <dilee@nvidia.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Manjunath@jasper.es, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:34:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012070429.GC2080@manju-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <361419345.198335.1318268242916.JavaMail.root@zimbra-prod-mbox-2.vmware.com>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
> > To: "Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Grant Likely"
> > <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > "Dilan Lee" <dilee@nvidia.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, Manjunath@jasper.es
> > Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2011 11:55:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
> >
>
> I'm a bit of a fly on the wall here, but I'm curious how this impacts suspend/resume.
> device_initialize->device_pm_init are called from device_register, so certainly this
> patch doesn't also ensure that the PM ordering matches probe ordering, which is bound
> to break suspend, right? Was this ever tested with the OMAP target? Shouldn't the
> PM change be also part of this patch set? I don't see why you would want to have this in
> without the PM changes.
suspend/resume handling is already in TODO list:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/135461
-M
>
> Maybe I have it all wrong though :-).
>
> A
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: manjugk@ti.com (G, Manjunath Kondaiah)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:34:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012070429.GC2080@manju-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <361419345.198335.1318268242916.JavaMail.root@zimbra-prod-mbox-2.vmware.com>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
> > To: "Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>, linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, "Grant Likely"
> > <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, linux-omap at vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org,
> > "Dilan Lee" <dilee@nvidia.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, Manjunath at jasper.es
> > Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2011 11:55:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
> >
>
> I'm a bit of a fly on the wall here, but I'm curious how this impacts suspend/resume.
> device_initialize->device_pm_init are called from device_register, so certainly this
> patch doesn't also ensure that the PM ordering matches probe ordering, which is bound
> to break suspend, right? Was this ever tested with the OMAP target? Shouldn't the
> PM change be also part of this patch set? I don't see why you would want to have this in
> without the PM changes.
suspend/resume handling is already in TODO list:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/135461
-M
>
> Maybe I have it all wrong though :-).
>
> A
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 5:33 [PATCH 0/5] Driver Probe Deferral Mechanism G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 5:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] drivercore: add new error value for deferred probe G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 6:43 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 6:43 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 10:00 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-07 10:00 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-07 22:12 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 22:12 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 23:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-07 23:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-07 23:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2011-10-08 0:12 ` Greg KH
2011-10-08 0:12 ` Greg KH
2011-10-09 22:59 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-09 22:59 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-09 22:59 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-10 1:06 ` Greg KH
2011-10-10 1:06 ` Greg KH
2011-10-10 1:06 ` Greg KH
2011-10-12 6:18 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-12 6:18 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-13 4:10 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 4:10 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 5:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 6:49 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 6:49 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 20:57 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-07 20:57 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-07 21:23 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 21:23 ` Greg KH
2011-10-08 4:03 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-08 4:03 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-08 15:55 ` Greg KH
2011-10-08 15:55 ` Greg KH
2011-10-08 18:18 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-08 18:18 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-10 17:37 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-10-10 17:37 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-10-11 12:29 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-11 12:29 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-13 4:09 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 4:09 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 14:18 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-13 14:18 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-13 14:31 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 14:31 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 14:31 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 15:21 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-13 15:21 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-13 16:04 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 16:04 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 16:04 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 0:13 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-14 0:13 ` Ming Lei
2011-10-13 17:15 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 17:15 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 18:16 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 18:16 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 18:16 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 18:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 18:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 15:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 15:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 15:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 16:17 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 16:17 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 16:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 16:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 16:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 17:20 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 17:20 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 17:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 17:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 17:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 18:25 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 18:25 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 18:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 18:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 18:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 19:07 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 19:07 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 18:56 ` David Daney
2011-10-14 18:56 ` David Daney
2011-10-14 19:03 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 19:03 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 19:03 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-14 19:09 ` David Daney
2011-10-14 19:09 ` David Daney
2011-10-14 15:37 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 15:37 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-14 15:37 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 7:04 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah [this message]
2011-10-12 7:04 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 21:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 21:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 21:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 5:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: Support driver probe deferral G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 5:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpiolib: handle deferral probe error G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 10:06 ` Alan Cox
2011-10-07 10:06 ` Alan Cox
2011-10-07 10:06 ` Alan Cox
2011-10-07 22:09 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 22:09 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-12 6:14 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-12 6:14 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-12 6:14 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-13 4:12 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 4:12 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07 5:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] omap: hsmmc: use platform_driver_register G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 6:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] Driver Probe Deferral Mechanism Greg KH
2011-10-07 6:50 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 6:50 ` Greg KH
2011-10-07 7:37 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 7:37 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 7:37 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-07 5:05 G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-07 5:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism G, Manjunath Kondaiah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111012070429.GC2080@manju-desktop \
--to=manjugk@ti.com \
--cc=Manjunath@jasper.es \
--cc=awarkentin@vmware.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dilee@nvidia.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.