From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ctalbott@google.com, ni@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:44:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111019134424.GC1140@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318998384-22525-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:26:18PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> blk_alloc_request() and freed_request() take different combinations of
> REQ_* @flags, @priv and @is_sync when @flags is superset of the latter
> two. Make them take @flags only. This cleans up the code a bit and
> will ease updating allocation related REQ_* flags.
>
> This patch doesn't introduce any functional difference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index a995141..fafa669 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void blk_free_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> }
>
> static struct request *
> -blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int flags, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int flags, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> struct request *rq = mempool_alloc(q->rq.rq_pool, gfp_mask);
>
> @@ -586,12 +586,10 @@ blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int flags, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
> rq->cmd_flags = flags | REQ_ALLOCED;
>
> - if (priv) {
> - if (unlikely(elv_set_request(q, rq, gfp_mask))) {
> - mempool_free(rq, q->rq.rq_pool);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> - rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_ELVPRIV;
Don't we need to set REQ_ELVPRIV in rq->cmd_flags in this new code?
> + if ((flags & REQ_ELVPRIV) &&
> + unlikely(elv_set_request(q, rq, gfp_mask))) {
> + mempool_free(rq, q->rq.rq_pool);
> + return NULL;
> }
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 23:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16 ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:44 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-10-19 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111019134424.GC1140@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ni@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.