All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	ctalbott@google.com, ni@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9EC602.5010207@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318998384-22525-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

On 2011-10-19 06:26, Tejun Heo wrote:
> request_queue is refcounted but actually depdends on lifetime
> management from the queue owner - on blk_cleanup_queue(), block layer
> expects that there's no request passing through request_queue and no
> new one will.
> 
> This is fundamentally broken.  The queue owner (e.g. SCSI layer)
> doesn't have a way to know whether there are other active users before
> calling blk_cleanup_queue() and other users (e.g. bsg) don't have any
> guarantee that the queue is and would stay valid while it's holding a
> reference.
> 
> With delay added in blk_queue_bio() before queue_lock is grabbed, the
> following oops can be easily triggered when a device is removed with
> in-flight IOs.
> 
>  sd 0:0:1:0: [sdb] Stopping disk
>  ata1.01: disabled
>  general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>  CPU 2
>  Modules linked in:
> 
>  Pid: 648, comm: test_rawio Not tainted 3.1.0-rc3-work+ #56 Bochs Bochs
>  RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8137d651>]  [<ffffffff8137d651>] elv_rqhash_find+0x61/0x100
>  ...
>  Process test_rawio (pid: 648, threadinfo ffff880019efa000, task ffff880019ef8a80)
>  ...
>  Call Trace:
>   [<ffffffff8137d774>] elv_merge+0x84/0xe0
>   [<ffffffff81385b54>] blk_queue_bio+0xf4/0x400
>   [<ffffffff813838ea>] generic_make_request+0xca/0x100
>   [<ffffffff81383994>] submit_bio+0x74/0x100
>   [<ffffffff811c53ec>] dio_bio_submit+0xbc/0xc0
>   [<ffffffff811c610e>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x92e/0xb40
>   [<ffffffff811c39f7>] blkdev_direct_IO+0x57/0x60
>   [<ffffffff8113b1c5>] generic_file_aio_read+0x6d5/0x760
>   [<ffffffff8118c1ca>] do_sync_read+0xda/0x120
>   [<ffffffff8118ce55>] vfs_read+0xc5/0x180
>   [<ffffffff8118cfaa>] sys_pread64+0x9a/0xb0
>   [<ffffffff81afaf6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> 
> This happens because blk_queue_cleanup() destroys the queue and
> elevator whether IOs are in progress or not and DEAD tests are
> sprinkled in the request processing path without proper
> synchronization.
> 
> Similar problem exists for blk-throtl.  On queue cleanup, blk-throtl
> is shutdown whether it has requests in it or not.  Depending on
> timing, it either oopses or throttled bios are lost putting tasks
> which are waiting for bio completion into eternal D state.
> 
> The way it should work is having the usual clear distinction between
> shutdown and release.  Shutdown drains all currently pending requests,
> marks the queue dead, and performs partial teardown of the now
> unnecessary part of the queue.  Even after shutdown is complete,
> reference holders are still allowed to issue requests to the queue
> although they will be immmediately failed.  The rest of teardown
> happens on release.
> 
> This patch makes the following changes to make blk_queue_cleanup()
> behave as proper shutdown.
> 
> * QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD is now set while holding both q->exit_mutex and
>   queue_lock.
> 
> * Unsynchronized DEAD check in generic_make_request_checks() removed.
>   This couldn't make any meaningful difference as the queue could die
>   after the check.
> 
> * blk_drain_queue() updated such that it can drain all requests and is
>   now called during cleanup.
> 
> * blk_throtl updated such that it checks DEAD on grabbing queue_lock,
>   drains all throttled bios during cleanup and free td when queue is
>   released.

This patch clashes a bit with the previous "fix" for getting rid of
privately assigned queue locks. I've kept that single bit.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-19  4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07           ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 23:51             ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16                   ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:44   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:06     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49             ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-10-19 17:13     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04       ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9EC602.5010207@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ni@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.