From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set()
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:07:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111019220717.GR25124@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111019220553.GQ25124@google.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:05:53PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmmm.... I don't know. If we're gonna bind rule existence to that of
Heh, I meant to say, "if those two are unbound,"
> device, wouldn't it be better to simply not check whether the device
> exists? The current behavior seems pretty confusing to me.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-19 23:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16 ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111019220717.GR25124@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.