* [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
@ 2011-10-24 11:27 Mark Brown
2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-10-24 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
declare struct gpio variables.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
include/linux/gpio.h | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
index 17b5a0d..e885103 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
struct device;
-struct gpio;
struct gpio_chip;
/*
@@ -36,6 +35,12 @@ struct gpio_chip;
* warning when something is wrongly called.
*/
+struct gpio {
+ unsigned gpio;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ const char *label;
+};
+
static inline bool gpio_is_valid(int number)
{
return false;
--
1.7.6.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
2011-10-24 11:27 [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib Mark Brown
@ 2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 12:07 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-24 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
> declare struct gpio variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Shouldn't this patch remove the definition from
include/asm-generic/gpio.h at the same time?
g.
> ---
> include/linux/gpio.h | 7 ++++++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
> index 17b5a0d..e885103 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
>
> struct device;
> -struct gpio;
> struct gpio_chip;
>
> /*
> @@ -36,6 +35,12 @@ struct gpio_chip;
> * warning when something is wrongly called.
> */
>
> +struct gpio {
> + unsigned gpio;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + const char *label;
> +};
> +
> static inline bool gpio_is_valid(int number)
> {
> return false;
> --
> 1.7.6.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-10-24 12:07 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-24 12:54 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-10-24 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:01:20PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
> > declare struct gpio variables.
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Shouldn't this patch remove the definition from
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h at the same time?
Both the original forward declaration and the new definition are within
the !GPIOLIB case of the #defines, it's just a minimal patch moving the
undefined forward declaration to a defintion. I didn't want to worry
about reading the individual users to figure out if they had separate
defintions separately to the work to get them all moved over to gpiolib.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
2011-10-24 12:07 ` Mark Brown
@ 2011-10-24 12:54 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 13:17 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-24 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:07:06PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:01:20PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
> > > declare struct gpio variables.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>
> > Shouldn't this patch remove the definition from
> > include/asm-generic/gpio.h at the same time?
>
> Both the original forward declaration and the new definition are within
> the !GPIOLIB case of the #defines, it's just a minimal patch moving the
> undefined forward declaration to a defintion. I didn't want to worry
> about reading the individual users to figure out if they had separate
> defintions separately to the work to get them all moved over to gpiolib.
I think it's good:
$ git grep asm/gpio.h | grep '\.h:'
arch/blackfin/include/asm/portmux.h:#include <asm/gpio.h>
arch/sh/include/mach-common/mach/magicpanelr2.h:#include <asm/gpio.h>
arch/unicore32/include/asm/gpio.h: * linux/arch/unicore32/include/asm/gpio.h
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:/* A platform's <asm/gpio.h> code may want to inline the I/O calls when
include/linux/gpio.h:#include <asm/gpio.h>
$ git grep -e $'struct[ \t]*gpio[^_a-z]' `git grep -l asm/gpio.h` `git grep -l mach/portmux.h` `git grep -l mach/magicpanelr2.h`
Documentation/gpio.txt: int gpio_request_array(struct gpio *array, size_t num);
Documentation/gpio.txt: void gpio_free_array(struct gpio *array, size_t num);
Documentation/gpio.txt:Further more, to ease the claim/release of multiple GPIOs, 'struct gpio' is
Documentation/gpio.txt: struct gpio {
Documentation/gpio.txt: static struct gpio leds_gpios[] = {
include/asm-generic/gpio.h: * struct gpio - a structure describing a GPIO with configuration
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:struct gpio {
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:extern int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num);
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:extern void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num);
include/linux/gpio.h:struct gpio;
include/linux/gpio.h:static inline int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
include/linux/gpio.h:static inline void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
You'll still need a 'struct gpio;' forward decl in asm-generic/gpio.h,
but that's better than having two copies. If you craft the patch,
I'll make sure some build coverage testing is performed before merging
it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
2011-10-24 12:54 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-10-24 13:17 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-10-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:54:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> You'll still need a 'struct gpio;' forward decl in asm-generic/gpio.h,
> but that's better than having two copies. If you craft the patch,
> I'll make sure some build coverage testing is performed before merging
> it.
Actually I don't think we don't need the forward declaration as we can
just declare the struct prior to including the asm header. Patch to
follow...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-24 13:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-24 11:27 [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib Mark Brown
2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 12:07 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-24 12:54 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 13:17 ` Mark Brown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.