All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
@ 2011-10-24 11:27 Mark Brown
  2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-10-24 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown

This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
declare struct gpio variables.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 include/linux/gpio.h |    7 ++++++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
index 17b5a0d..e885103 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 
 struct device;
-struct gpio;
 struct gpio_chip;
 
 /*
@@ -36,6 +35,12 @@ struct gpio_chip;
  * warning when something is wrongly called.
  */
 
+struct gpio {
+	unsigned	gpio;
+	unsigned long	flags;
+	const char	*label;
+};
+
 static inline bool gpio_is_valid(int number)
 {
 	return false;
-- 
1.7.6.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
  2011-10-24 11:27 [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib Mark Brown
@ 2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
  2011-10-24 12:07   ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-24 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
> declare struct gpio variables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Shouldn't this patch remove the definition from
include/asm-generic/gpio.h at the same time?

g.

> ---
>  include/linux/gpio.h |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
> index 17b5a0d..e885103 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  
>  struct device;
> -struct gpio;
>  struct gpio_chip;
>  
>  /*
> @@ -36,6 +35,12 @@ struct gpio_chip;
>   * warning when something is wrongly called.
>   */
>  
> +struct gpio {
> +	unsigned	gpio;
> +	unsigned long	flags;
> +	const char	*label;
> +};
> +
>  static inline bool gpio_is_valid(int number)
>  {
>  	return false;
> -- 
> 1.7.6.3
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
  2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-10-24 12:07   ` Mark Brown
  2011-10-24 12:54     ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-10-24 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:01:20PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
> > declare struct gpio variables.

> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

> Shouldn't this patch remove the definition from
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h at the same time?

Both the original forward declaration and the new definition are within
the !GPIOLIB case of the #defines, it's just a minimal patch moving the
undefined forward declaration to a defintion.  I didn't want to worry
about reading the individual users to figure out if they had separate
defintions separately to the work to get them all moved over to gpiolib.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
  2011-10-24 12:07   ` Mark Brown
@ 2011-10-24 12:54     ` Grant Likely
  2011-10-24 13:17       ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-24 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:07:06PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:01:20PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > This makes the stub gpio_request_array() much more usable as drivers can
> > > declare struct gpio variables.
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> 
> > Shouldn't this patch remove the definition from
> > include/asm-generic/gpio.h at the same time?
> 
> Both the original forward declaration and the new definition are within
> the !GPIOLIB case of the #defines, it's just a minimal patch moving the
> undefined forward declaration to a defintion.  I didn't want to worry
> about reading the individual users to figure out if they had separate
> defintions separately to the work to get them all moved over to gpiolib.

I think it's good:

$ git grep asm/gpio.h | grep '\.h:'
arch/blackfin/include/asm/portmux.h:#include <asm/gpio.h>
arch/sh/include/mach-common/mach/magicpanelr2.h:#include <asm/gpio.h>
arch/unicore32/include/asm/gpio.h: * linux/arch/unicore32/include/asm/gpio.h
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:/* A platform's <asm/gpio.h> code may want to inline the I/O calls when
include/linux/gpio.h:#include <asm/gpio.h>

$ git grep -e $'struct[ \t]*gpio[^_a-z]' `git grep -l asm/gpio.h` `git grep -l mach/portmux.h` `git grep -l mach/magicpanelr2.h` 
Documentation/gpio.txt: int gpio_request_array(struct  gpio *array, size_t num);
Documentation/gpio.txt: void gpio_free_array(struct      gpio *array, size_t num);
Documentation/gpio.txt:Further more, to ease the claim/release of multiple GPIOs, 'struct gpio' is
Documentation/gpio.txt: struct gpio {
Documentation/gpio.txt: static struct gpio leds_gpios[] = {
include/asm-generic/gpio.h: * struct gpio - a structure describing a GPIO with configuration
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:struct gpio {
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:extern int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num);
include/asm-generic/gpio.h:extern void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num);
include/linux/gpio.h:struct gpio;
include/linux/gpio.h:static inline int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
include/linux/gpio.h:static inline void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)

You'll still need a 'struct gpio;' forward decl in asm-generic/gpio.h,
but that's better than having two copies.  If you craft the patch,
I'll make sure some build coverage testing is performed before merging
it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib
  2011-10-24 12:54     ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-10-24 13:17       ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-10-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-kernel

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:54:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:

> You'll still need a 'struct gpio;' forward decl in asm-generic/gpio.h,
> but that's better than having two copies.  If you craft the patch,
> I'll make sure some build coverage testing is performed before merging
> it.

Actually I don't think we don't need the forward declaration as we can
just declare the struct prior to including the asm header.  Patch to
follow...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-24 13:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-24 11:27 [PATCH] gpiolib: Provide a definition of struct gpio for the stub gpiolib Mark Brown
2011-10-24 12:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 12:07   ` Mark Brown
2011-10-24 12:54     ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 13:17       ` Mark Brown

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.