* kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? @ 2011-11-15 12:51 Américo Wang 2011-11-16 1:12 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Américo Wang @ 2011-11-15 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman; +Cc: kexec Hello, Simon, I am wondering why I get: % git log --pretty=oneline -n 1 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 kexec-tools: powerpc: Add more 64bit relocations % git describe v1.101-618-g920f4ed % git tag -l v1.101 v2.0.0 v2.0.0-rc1 v2.0.1 v2.0.1-rc1 v2.0.2 v2.0.2-rc1 v2.0.2-rc2 v20061214 v20070319-rc v20070330 v20071017-rc v20071030 v20080219-rc v20080221-rc v20080226-rc v20080227 v20080318-rc v20080324 HEAD should be v2.0.2, isn't it? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? 2011-11-15 12:51 kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? Américo Wang @ 2011-11-16 1:12 ` Simon Horman 2011-11-16 2:04 ` Américo Wang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2011-11-16 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Américo Wang; +Cc: kexec On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:51:15PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > Hello, Simon, > > I am wondering why I get: > > % git log --pretty=oneline -n 1 > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 kexec-tools: powerpc: Add > more 64bit relocations > > % git describe > v1.101-618-g920f4ed > > % git tag -l > v1.101 > v2.0.0 > v2.0.0-rc1 > v2.0.1 > v2.0.1-rc1 > v2.0.2 > v2.0.2-rc1 > v2.0.2-rc2 > v20061214 > v20070319-rc > v20070330 > v20071017-rc > v20071030 > v20080219-rc > v20080221-rc > v20080226-rc > v20080227 > v20080318-rc > v20080324 > > HEAD should be v2.0.2, isn't it? Hi Américo, I'm not sure that I understand your question, but 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master (development) branch. And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? 2011-11-16 1:12 ` Simon Horman @ 2011-11-16 2:04 ` Américo Wang 2011-11-16 2:35 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Américo Wang @ 2011-11-16 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman; +Cc: kexec On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > > Hi Américo, > > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master > (development) branch. And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. > Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? 2011-11-16 2:04 ` Américo Wang @ 2011-11-16 2:35 ` Simon Horman 2011-11-16 15:26 ` Américo Wang 2011-11-16 15:51 ` Don Zickus 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2011-11-16 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Américo Wang; +Cc: kexec On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > > > > Hi Américo, > > > > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but > > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master > > (development) branch. And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. > > > > Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not > v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? Yes, I think so. I'm rather unsure why it isn't. However, the following does seem to give a result more in line with expectations. $ git describe --tags HEAD v2.0.2-94-g920f4ed _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? 2011-11-16 2:35 ` Simon Horman @ 2011-11-16 15:26 ` Américo Wang 2011-11-16 15:51 ` Don Zickus 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Américo Wang @ 2011-11-16 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman; +Cc: kexec On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Américo, >> > >> > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but >> > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master >> > (development) branch. And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. >> > >> >> Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not >> v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? > > Yes, I think so. I'm rather unsure why it isn't. > However, the following does seem to give a result more in line with > expectations. > > $ git describe --tags HEAD > v2.0.2-94-g920f4ed > For linux kernel, they are the same... [wangcong@cr0]~/linux-2.6% git describe --tag v3.2-rc1-306-g7f80850 [wangcong@cr0]~/linux-2.6% git describe v3.2-rc1-306-g7f80850 I am wondering why it is different for kexec-tools... Thanks. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? 2011-11-16 2:35 ` Simon Horman 2011-11-16 15:26 ` Américo Wang @ 2011-11-16 15:51 ` Don Zickus 2011-11-17 23:19 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Don Zickus @ 2011-11-16 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman; +Cc: Américo Wang, kexec On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:35:03AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Américo, > > > > > > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but > > > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master > > > (development) branch. And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. > > > > > > > Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not > > v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? > > Yes, I think so. I'm rather unsure why it isn't. > However, the following does seem to give a result more in line with > expectations. Are you creating annotated tags or lightweight tags? That might be the difference. Cheers, Don _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? 2011-11-16 15:51 ` Don Zickus @ 2011-11-17 23:19 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2011-11-17 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Don Zickus; +Cc: Américo Wang, kexec On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:03AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:35:03AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Américo, > > > > > > > > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but > > > > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master > > > > (development) branch. And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not > > > v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? > > > > Yes, I think so. I'm rather unsure why it isn't. > > However, the following does seem to give a result more in line with > > expectations. > > Are you creating annotated tags or lightweight tags? That might be the > difference. I believe I am creating lightweight tags, I guess that is the cause of the difference. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-17 23:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-11-15 12:51 kexec-tools git tree is tagged incorrectly? Américo Wang 2011-11-16 1:12 ` Simon Horman 2011-11-16 2:04 ` Américo Wang 2011-11-16 2:35 ` Simon Horman 2011-11-16 15:26 ` Américo Wang 2011-11-16 15:51 ` Don Zickus 2011-11-17 23:19 ` Simon Horman
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.