All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 01:22:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111204012239.GA31215@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112032331.07336.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:31:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code,
> > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific implementation and using
> > the generic code instead.

> No, the first patch didn't add any replacements for the functions that the
> second patch removed.  At least I don't see the replacements in the first
> patch.

Oh, right.  It'd really help if you were more specific.  I'd probably
have realised earlier that you are probably talking about the stop_dev
and start_dev functions which appear to have got caught up in the mess
of a rebase somehow - I didn't intentionally remove them as their
absence from the patch description and the lack of any removal of
references to them should suggest.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 01:22:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111204012239.GA31215@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112032331.07336.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:31:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code,
> > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific implementation and using
> > the generic code instead.

> No, the first patch didn't add any replacements for the functions that the
> second patch removed.  At least I don't see the replacements in the first
> patch.

Oh, right.  It'd really help if you were more specific.  I'd probably
have realised earlier that you are probably talking about the stop_dev
and start_dev functions which appear to have got caught up in the mess
of a rebase somehow - I didn't intentionally remove them as their
absence from the patch description and the lack of any removal of
references to them should suggest.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-04  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-01 18:48 [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor Mark Brown
2011-12-01 18:48 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-01 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: Use common " Mark Brown
2011-12-01 18:48   ` Mark Brown
2011-12-01 20:37   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-01 20:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-02  0:33     ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02  0:33       ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02 22:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-02 22:36         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-03 11:03         ` Mark Brown
2011-12-03 11:03           ` Mark Brown
2011-12-03 22:31           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-03 22:31             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04  1:22             ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-12-04  1:22               ` Mark Brown
2011-12-04 19:53               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04 19:53                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04  1:24           ` [PATCH v2] " Mark Brown
2011-12-04  1:24             ` Mark Brown
2011-12-01 18:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: S3C64XX: Implement basic power domain support Mark Brown
2011-12-01 18:48   ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02  0:35   ` Kyungmin Park
2011-12-02  0:35     ` Kyungmin Park
2011-12-02  0:56     ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02  0:56       ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02 18:25       ` Tomasz Figa
2011-12-02 18:25         ` Tomasz Figa
2011-12-02 18:57         ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02 18:57           ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02 19:06           ` Tomasz Figa
2011-12-02 19:06             ` Tomasz Figa
2011-12-02 20:10   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-12-02 20:10     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-12-02 21:07     ` Mark Brown
2011-12-02 21:07       ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 21:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-07 21:44         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-08  1:09         ` Mark Brown
2011-12-08  1:09           ` Mark Brown
2011-12-08 22:15           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-08 22:15             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-08 22:22             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-08 22:22               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04 20:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-04 23:10   ` Mark Brown
2011-12-04 23:10     ` Mark Brown
2011-12-05  0:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-05  0:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-05  0:15       ` Mark Brown
2011-12-05  0:15         ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 10:20         ` Kukjin Kim
2011-12-06 10:20           ` Kukjin Kim
2011-12-06 12:04           ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-12-06 12:04             ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-12-06 14:33             ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 14:33               ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 21:39           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-06 21:39             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-07 12:35             ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 12:35               ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 21:28               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-07 21:28                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-08  0:40                 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-08  0:40                   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111204012239.GA31215@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.