From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Containers
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Paul Menage <paul-inf54ven1CmVyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org>,
Mandeep Singh Baines
<msb-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Remove unnecessary task_lock before fetching css_set on migration
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:29:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220212905.GU13529@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324407673-18975-1-git-send-email-fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org) wrote:
> When we fetch the css_set of the tasks on cgroup migration, we don't need
> anymore to synchronize against cgroup_exit() that could swap the old one
> with init_css_set. Now that we are using threadgroup_lock() during
> the migrations, we don't need to worry about it anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Containers <containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Paul Menage <paul-inf54ven1CmVyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 5fdd98c..6b5f693 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1850,13 +1850,13 @@ static int cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
> struct css_set *newcg;
>
> /*
> - * get old css_set. we need to take task_lock and refcount it, because
> - * an exiting task can change its css_set to init_css_set and drop its
> - * old one without taking cgroup_mutex.
> + * get old css_set. We are synchronized through threadgroup_lock()
> + * against PF_EXITING setting such that we can't race against
> + * cgroup_exit() changing the css_set to init_css_set and dropping the
> + * old one.
> */
> - task_lock(tsk);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING);
> oldcg = tsk->cgroups;
> - task_unlock(tsk);
>
> /* locate or allocate a new css_set for this task. */
> if (guarantee) {
> @@ -1875,9 +1875,7 @@ static int cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - /* @tsk can't exit as its threadgroup is locked */
> task_lock(tsk);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING);
> rcu_assign_pointer(tsk->cgroups, newcg);
> task_unlock(tsk);
>
> @@ -2177,10 +2175,13 @@ int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
> /* nothing to do if this task is already in the cgroup */
> if (tc->cgrp == cgrp)
> continue;
> - /* get old css_set pointer */
> - task_lock(tc->task);
> + /*
> + * get old css_set pointer. threadgroup is locked so this is
> + * safe against concurrent cgroup_exit() changing this to
> + * init_css_set.
> + */
> oldcg = tc->task->cgroups;
> - task_unlock(tc->task);
> +
> /* if we don't already have it in the list get a new one */
> if (!css_set_fetched(cgrp, tc->task, oldcg, &newcg_list))
> if (css_set_prefetch(cgrp, oldcg, &newcg_list))
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Remove unnecessary task_lock before fetching css_set on migration
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:29:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220212905.GU13529@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324407673-18975-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@gmail.com) wrote:
> When we fetch the css_set of the tasks on cgroup migration, we don't need
> anymore to synchronize against cgroup_exit() that could swap the old one
> with init_css_set. Now that we are using threadgroup_lock() during
> the migrations, we don't need to worry about it anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>
> Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 5fdd98c..6b5f693 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1850,13 +1850,13 @@ static int cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
> struct css_set *newcg;
>
> /*
> - * get old css_set. we need to take task_lock and refcount it, because
> - * an exiting task can change its css_set to init_css_set and drop its
> - * old one without taking cgroup_mutex.
> + * get old css_set. We are synchronized through threadgroup_lock()
> + * against PF_EXITING setting such that we can't race against
> + * cgroup_exit() changing the css_set to init_css_set and dropping the
> + * old one.
> */
> - task_lock(tsk);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING);
> oldcg = tsk->cgroups;
> - task_unlock(tsk);
>
> /* locate or allocate a new css_set for this task. */
> if (guarantee) {
> @@ -1875,9 +1875,7 @@ static int cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - /* @tsk can't exit as its threadgroup is locked */
> task_lock(tsk);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING);
> rcu_assign_pointer(tsk->cgroups, newcg);
> task_unlock(tsk);
>
> @@ -2177,10 +2175,13 @@ int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
> /* nothing to do if this task is already in the cgroup */
> if (tc->cgrp == cgrp)
> continue;
> - /* get old css_set pointer */
> - task_lock(tc->task);
> + /*
> + * get old css_set pointer. threadgroup is locked so this is
> + * safe against concurrent cgroup_exit() changing this to
> + * init_css_set.
> + */
> oldcg = tc->task->cgroups;
> - task_unlock(tc->task);
> +
> /* if we don't already have it in the list get a new one */
> if (!css_set_fetched(cgrp, tc->task, oldcg, &newcg_list))
> if (css_set_prefetch(cgrp, oldcg, &newcg_list))
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-16 16:38 [PATCH] cgroup: remove redundate get/put of old css_set from migrate Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-16 16:38 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-16 16:38 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
[not found] ` <1324053511-24591-1-git-send-email-msb-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-17 16:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-17 16:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-17 16:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-19 2:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-19 2:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-19 2:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-19 17:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-19 17:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-19 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-19 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20111219172027.GJ24519-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-19 18:44 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-19 18:44 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
[not found] ` <1324320274-18485-1-git-send-email-msb-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-20 18:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 18:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 18:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Remove unnecessary task_lock before fetching css_set on migration Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 19:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 19:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <1324407673-18975-1-git-send-email-fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: Drop task_lock(parent) on cgroup_fork() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 19:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Remove unnecessary task_lock before fetching css_set on migration Tejun Heo
2011-12-20 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20111220191443.GE10752-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-20 19:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 19:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-20 21:29 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-20 21:29 ` Mandeep Singh Baines [this message]
2011-12-20 21:29 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-21 1:53 ` Li Zefan
2011-12-21 1:53 ` Li Zefan
2011-12-19 17:20 ` [PATCH] cgroup: remove redundate get/put of old css_set from migrate Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111220212905.GU13529@google.com \
--to=msb-f7+t8e8rja9g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paul-inf54ven1CmVyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.