All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
	'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel for v3.3
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:37:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110223712.GL7164@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201201102013.54958.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:13:54PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That sounds like it'd be helpful overall but it's something that has to
> > be sorted out at the maintainer level.  I'm guessing there's not really
> > much that contributors can do here?

> I think you did everything as good as you could, we just need to routinely
> call for everyone to submit stuff in time. A number of maintainers sent stuff
> after Christmas (which I expected to start the merge window) and were mostly
> lucky because Linus gave us an extra 10 days to sort things out.

I guess it would also be useful to have some way to compare what's in
-next with what's in the arm-soc tree and chase people if that diff gets
big.  I do also wonder if it's worth letting people push stuff to you
more aggressively - right now you seem to be asking people to batch
things up and I wonder if that's making it a it easier for things to end
up dropping on the floor if a time based routine isn't working well for
people.

> end, samsung also did for the most part but not entirely and you were
> unfortunate to be the contributor of the patches that missed out.

It's not just me, I'm just vocal and perhaps more to the point spend a
reasonable amount of time chasing stuff into various trees so want to
figure out if I need to change what I'm doing with that.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel for v3.3
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:37:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110223712.GL7164@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201201102013.54958.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:13:54PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That sounds like it'd be helpful overall but it's something that has to
> > be sorted out at the maintainer level.  I'm guessing there's not really
> > much that contributors can do here?

> I think you did everything as good as you could, we just need to routinely
> call for everyone to submit stuff in time. A number of maintainers sent stuff
> after Christmas (which I expected to start the merge window) and were mostly
> lucky because Linus gave us an extra 10 days to sort things out.

I guess it would also be useful to have some way to compare what's in
-next with what's in the arm-soc tree and chase people if that diff gets
big.  I do also wonder if it's worth letting people push stuff to you
more aggressively - right now you seem to be asking people to batch
things up and I wonder if that's making it a it easier for things to end
up dropping on the floor if a time based routine isn't working well for
people.

> end, samsung also did for the most part but not entirely and you were
> unfortunate to be the contributor of the patches that missed out.

It's not just me, I'm just vocal and perhaps more to the point spend a
reasonable amount of time chasing stuff into various trees so want to
figure out if I need to change what I'm doing with that.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-10 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-03 23:33 [GIT PULL] Samsung devel for v3.3 Kukjin Kim
2012-01-03 23:33 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-06 21:58 ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-06 21:58   ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-07 10:09   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-07 10:09     ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-08 20:49   ` Mark Brown
2012-01-08 20:49     ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09  1:21     ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-09  1:21       ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-09  1:40       ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-09  1:40         ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-09  2:03         ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-09  2:03           ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-09 15:56         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-09 15:56           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-09 16:11           ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09 16:11             ` Mark Brown
2012-01-10  9:06             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-10  9:06               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-10 18:31               ` Mark Brown
2012-01-10 18:31                 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-10 18:44                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-01-10 18:44                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-01-10 18:46                   ` Mark Brown
2012-01-10 18:46                     ` Mark Brown
2012-01-10 19:00                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-01-10 19:00                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-01-10 20:13                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-10 20:13                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-10 22:37                       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-01-10 22:37                         ` Mark Brown
2012-01-11  0:11                         ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-11  0:11                           ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-11  6:39                           ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-11  6:39                             ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-11 16:19                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-11 16:19                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-11 16:50                           ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-11 16:50                             ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-11 17:29                             ` Mark Brown
2012-01-11 17:29                               ` Mark Brown
2012-01-11  6:20               ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-11  6:20                 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-09  8:26       ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09  8:26         ` Mark Brown
2012-01-17  6:40         ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-17  6:40           ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-17  7:23           ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-17  7:23             ` Kukjin Kim
2012-01-17  7:24             ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-17  7:24               ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-17 10:53           ` Mark Brown
2012-01-17 10:53             ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09  9:58     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-09  9:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-09 23:24       ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09 23:24         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120110223712.GL7164@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.