From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>,
artem.bityutskiy@intel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:41:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130134130.GG15596@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201201301430.44374.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
> Hehe, just torturing you guys a bit :)
And the gain of that is? The only outcome I currently see is that I feel
less motivated to put you on CC next time.
> > > > Did it always do that? Or is a newer version needed?
> > >
> > > I can't comment on this one, I never used it. I rather got NAND working
> > > properly.
> >
> > Me neither. But if so, we have another regression candidate.
>
> What regression candidate ? The version of NAND driver in u-boot should be close
> to what's in mainline Linux kernel.
I am not talking about U-Boot here. I was wondering if somebody who uses
the FSL deployment method would need to update kobs-ng, so a proper BBT
gets written. If so, people missing the need to update would see a
regression. Which is another reason to not make BBT usage default. But I
maybe wrong here. Huang will tell.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:41:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130134130.GG15596@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201201301430.44374.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> Hehe, just torturing you guys a bit :)
And the gain of that is? The only outcome I currently see is that I feel
less motivated to put you on CC next time.
> > > > Did it always do that? Or is a newer version needed?
> > >
> > > I can't comment on this one, I never used it. I rather got NAND working
> > > properly.
> >
> > Me neither. But if so, we have another regression candidate.
>
> What regression candidate ? The version of NAND driver in u-boot should be close
> to what's in mainline Linux kernel.
I am not talking about U-Boot here. I was wondering if somebody who uses
the FSL deployment method would need to update kobs-ng, so a proper BBT
gets written. If so, people missing the need to update would see a
regression. Which is another reason to not make BBT usage default. But I
maybe wrong here. Huang will tell.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120130/d8152c1a/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 4:36 [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 4:36 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 9:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 9:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 10:32 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 10:32 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 10:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 10:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 11:29 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 11:29 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 11:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 11:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 12:27 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 12:27 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-01-30 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 14:33 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 14:33 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 8:47 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 8:47 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 9:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 9:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 9:38 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 9:38 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 11:37 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 11:37 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 11:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 11:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 12:21 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 12:21 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 12:24 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 12:24 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130134130.GG15596@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@intel.com \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.