From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>,
artem.bityutskiy@intel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201301533.28882.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130134130.GG15596@pengutronix.de>
> > Hehe, just torturing you guys a bit :)
>
> And the gain of that is? The only outcome I currently see is that I feel
> less motivated to put you on CC next time.
>
> > > > > Did it always do that? Or is a newer version needed?
> > > >
> > > > I can't comment on this one, I never used it. I rather got NAND
> > > > working properly.
> > >
> > > Me neither. But if so, we have another regression candidate.
> >
> > What regression candidate ? The version of NAND driver in u-boot should
> > be close to what's in mainline Linux kernel.
>
> I am not talking about U-Boot here. I was wondering if somebody who uses
> the FSL deployment method would need to update kobs-ng, so a proper BBT
> gets written.
... if someone actually still uses kobs-ng.
> If so, people missing the need to update would see a
> regression. Which is another reason to not make BBT usage default. But I
> maybe wrong here. Huang will tell.
Yes, either him or Fabio. This is a good point actually.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201301533.28882.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130134130.GG15596@pengutronix.de>
> > Hehe, just torturing you guys a bit :)
>
> And the gain of that is? The only outcome I currently see is that I feel
> less motivated to put you on CC next time.
>
> > > > > Did it always do that? Or is a newer version needed?
> > > >
> > > > I can't comment on this one, I never used it. I rather got NAND
> > > > working properly.
> > >
> > > Me neither. But if so, we have another regression candidate.
> >
> > What regression candidate ? The version of NAND driver in u-boot should
> > be close to what's in mainline Linux kernel.
>
> I am not talking about U-Boot here. I was wondering if somebody who uses
> the FSL deployment method would need to update kobs-ng, so a proper BBT
> gets written.
... if someone actually still uses kobs-ng.
> If so, people missing the need to update would see a
> regression. Which is another reason to not make BBT usage default. But I
> maybe wrong here. Huang will tell.
Yes, either him or Fabio. This is a good point actually.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 4:36 [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 4:36 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 9:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 9:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 10:32 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 10:32 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 10:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 10:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 11:29 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 11:29 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-30 11:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 11:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 12:27 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 12:27 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 14:33 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-01-30 14:33 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 8:47 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 8:47 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 9:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 9:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 9:38 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 9:38 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-31 11:37 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 11:37 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 11:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 11:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 12:21 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-31 12:21 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 12:24 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 12:24 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-30 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-30 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201301533.28882.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@intel.com \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.