* Re: XFS for-next branch
@ 2012-01-27 0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-27 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Myers; +Cc: xfs-masters, linux-next, xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 770 bytes --]
Hi Ben,
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> Could you pull XFS updates from
>
> git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
>
> instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
<david@fromorbit.com>, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that?
i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
2012-01-27 0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
(?)
@ 2012-01-27 0:26 ` Dave Chinner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2012-01-27 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: xfs-masters, Ben Myers, linux-next, xfs
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > Could you pull XFS updates from
> >
> > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> >
> > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
>
> OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
>
> Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
>
> Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
> <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that?
> i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
I'd suggest changing the xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com address to just the
xfs list (xfs@oss.sgi.com) as more people will see it that way. You
can leave my email address there if you want because I'm in the same
timezone as you, Stephen. Ben is the only person that can manipulate
the tree, though, so you probably should add him to the list, too.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
2012-01-27 0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-27 16:01 ` Ben Myers
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2012-01-27 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, xfs, David Chinner, xfs-masters
Hey Stephen,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > Could you pull XFS updates from
> >
> > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> >
> > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
>
> OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
flexability WRT what is in for-next.
> Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see
how it goes, and then re-evaluate.
> Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
> <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that?
> i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me,
and s/xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com/xfs@oss.sgi.com/. It really helps that
you two are in the same timezone. ;)
Thanks,
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
@ 2012-01-27 16:01 ` Ben Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2012-01-27 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: xfs-masters, linux-next, xfs
Hey Stephen,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > Could you pull XFS updates from
> >
> > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> >
> > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
>
> OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
flexability WRT what is in for-next.
> Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see
how it goes, and then re-evaluate.
> Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
> <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that?
> i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me,
and s/xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com/xfs@oss.sgi.com/. It really helps that
you two are in the same timezone. ;)
Thanks,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
2012-01-27 16:01 ` Ben Myers
@ 2012-01-27 21:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-27 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Myers; +Cc: linux-next, xfs, David Chinner, xfs-masters
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1726 bytes --]
Hi Ben,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you pull XFS updates from
> > >
> > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> > >
> > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
> >
> > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
>
> Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
> them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
> flexability WRT what is in for-next.
Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called
"oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the
branches called "for-next" and "master", right?
>
> > Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
>
> I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see
> how it goes, and then re-evaluate.
Ah, ok, I see.
>
> > Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
> > <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that?
> > i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
>
> I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me,
> and s/xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com/xfs@oss.sgi.com/. It really helps that
> you two are in the same timezone. ;)
OK, I will sort all this out on Monday.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
@ 2012-01-27 21:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-27 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Myers; +Cc: xfs-masters, linux-next, xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1726 bytes --]
Hi Ben,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you pull XFS updates from
> > >
> > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> > >
> > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
> >
> > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
>
> Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
> them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
> flexability WRT what is in for-next.
Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called
"oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the
branches called "for-next" and "master", right?
>
> > Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
>
> I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see
> how it goes, and then re-evaluate.
Ah, ok, I see.
>
> > Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
> > <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that?
> > i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
>
> I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me,
> and s/xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com/xfs@oss.sgi.com/. It really helps that
> you two are in the same timezone. ;)
OK, I will sort all this out on Monday.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
2012-01-27 21:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-30 18:27 ` Ben Myers
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2012-01-30 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: xfs-masters, linux-next, xfs
Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:17:09AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Could you pull XFS updates from
> > > >
> > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> > > >
> > > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
> > >
> > > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> > > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> > > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
> >
> > Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
> > them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
> > flexability WRT what is in for-next.
>
> Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called
> "oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the
> branches called "for-next" and "master", right?
I am referring to for-next and master branches, at
git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git. Sorry I wasn't very clear.
Thanks,
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS for-next branch
@ 2012-01-30 18:27 ` Ben Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2012-01-30 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: xfs-masters, linux-next, xfs
Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:17:09AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Could you pull XFS updates from
> > > >
> > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> > > >
> > > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
> > >
> > > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> > > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> > > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
> >
> > Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
> > them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
> > flexability WRT what is in for-next.
>
> Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called
> "oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the
> branches called "for-next" and "master", right?
I am referring to for-next and master branches, at
git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git. Sorry I wasn't very clear.
Thanks,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread