From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, davem@davemloft.net,
ddaney.cavm@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:51:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224155155.GA19381@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120224090811.GB814@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:
[...]
> > [...] so we are going to have to change either the branch site
> > or the test for true/false name. The above
> > 'static_key_inline_true/false' solves that.
>
> It's generally good practice to make the mostly commonly used
> method names the simplest/shortest names - i.e. I don't think we
> should make it longer via adding an _inline to every use.
>
> In that sense static_key_true() has pretty optimal length - we'd
> like these tests to also be visually unintrusive.
>
> So in the latest patch (still under testing, will push it out
> soon) we have:
>
> static_key_true()
> static_key_false()
> static_key_enabled()
Hi Ingo,
Yes, I think your proposal makes sense. The "_inline_" would add lots of
typing for little clarity value. And I guess people will get used to
these constructs.
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-21 20:02 [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] jump label: Add a WARN() if jump label key count goes negative Jason Baron
2012-02-29 10:13 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] jump label: fix compiler warning Jason Baron
2012-02-29 10:14 ` [tip:perf/core] jump label: Fix " tip-bot for Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 03/10] jump label: introduce very_unlikely() Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 04/10] jump label: introduce very_likely() Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf: update to use 'very_unlikely()' Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 06/10] tracepoints: update to use very_unlikely() Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched: update to use very_[un]likely() Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 08/10] kvm: update to use very_unlikely() Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 09/10] net: " Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH 10/10] jump label: Add docs better explaining the whole jump label mechanism Jason Baron
2012-02-29 10:15 ` [tip:perf/core] static keys: Add docs better explaining the whole 'struct static_key' mechanism tip-bot for Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:09 ` [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-21 20:20 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-21 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-21 21:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-21 21:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-22 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 8:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 8:58 ` [PATCH] static keys: Introduce 'struct static_key', very_[un]likely(), static_key_slow_[inc|dec]() Ingo Molnar
2012-02-29 10:16 ` [tip:perf/core] static keys: Introduce 'struct static_key', static_key_true()/false() and static_key_slow_[inc|dec]() tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 9:03 ` [PATCH] jump labels: Explain the .config option better Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 15:08 ` [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 15:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 21:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2012-02-23 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-23 16:21 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-23 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-24 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-23 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 22:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-23 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-23 22:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-23 23:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-24 2:25 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-24 9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-24 15:35 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-27 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-24 15:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2012-02-24 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-24 7:52 ` static keys: Introduce 'struct static_key', static_key_true()/false() and static_key_slow_[inc|dec]() Ingo Molnar
2012-02-24 7:59 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2012-02-24 7:54 ` [PATCH] static keys: Add docs better explaining the whole 'struct static_key' mechanism Ingo Molnar
2012-02-23 22:45 ` [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups + docs Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-24 2:42 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-21 20:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-21 21:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 7:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 7:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 7:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 13:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-22 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-22 14:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-22 14:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-22 14:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 15:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 15:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-22 15:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 15:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 15:42 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-22 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-22 15:56 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-22 16:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-22 15:19 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-22 15:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 17:14 ` Richard Henderson
2012-02-22 18:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 18:58 ` Jason Baron
2012-02-22 19:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120224155155.GA19381@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.