From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:44:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120225114414.GC3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120225101758.GJ22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1175 bytes --]
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:17:58AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:39:05AM +0000, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> > That's not what Mark is talking about. You somehow posted patch 0/6 as a
> > reply to the *previous* patchset, so the two patchsets were merged into
> > one email thread.
> Sorry, you and Mark are not listening to Shawn. Even worse, you're
> telling Shawn that what he's trying to explain to you is not the point
> when it is actually the whole point.
> The "[PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl" was posted as a
> follow-up to "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ".
> So, the "*previous* patchset" _was_ "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let
> SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ" and not some other random patch set. That
> is a fundamental fact, which can't be argued. Anyone can verify it, and
> it can be verified by checking the email headers.
No, I get that it's a new version of the same patch set rather than a
totally unrelated patch set that was followed up to - I'd still rather
it weren't posted like that as the threading ends up being less helpful
than is desirable.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:44:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120225114414.GC3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120225101758.GJ22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:17:58AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:39:05AM +0000, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> > That's not what Mark is talking about. You somehow posted patch 0/6 as a
> > reply to the *previous* patchset, so the two patchsets were merged into
> > one email thread.
> Sorry, you and Mark are not listening to Shawn. Even worse, you're
> telling Shawn that what he's trying to explain to you is not the point
> when it is actually the whole point.
> The "[PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl" was posted as a
> follow-up to "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ".
> So, the "*previous* patchset" _was_ "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let
> SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ" and not some other random patch set. That
> is a fundamental fact, which can't be argued. Anyone can verify it, and
> it can be verified by checking the email headers.
No, I get that it's a new version of the same patch set rather than a
totally unrelated patch set that was followed up to - I'd still rather
it weren't posted like that as the threading ends up being less helpful
than is desirable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120225/63a85b3a/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-25 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 164+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 6:47 [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: imx: move SND_SOC_AC97_BUS selection down to machine driver Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: imx: initialize dma_params burstsize just in imx-ssi Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: imx: separate imx-pcm bits from imx-ssi driver Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 6:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: merge imx into fsl Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: add an explicit Kconfig option for imx-ssi driver Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 15:40 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-23 15:40 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 1:28 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 1:28 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 2:59 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-24 2:59 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-24 3:37 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 3:37 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: fsl: separate SSI and DMA Kconfig options Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: imx: merge sound/soc/imx into sound/soc/fsl Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: fsl: make fsl_ssi driver compilable on ARM/IMX Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 14:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-23 15:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-02-23 15:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-02-23 15:44 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-23 15:44 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-23 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 17:04 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-23 17:04 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-23 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 19:01 ` Trent Piepho
2012-02-23 19:01 ` [alsa-devel] " Trent Piepho
2012-02-24 21:29 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 21:29 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 21:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 21:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 22:00 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 22:00 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 22:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 22:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 23:05 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:05 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 23:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 23:22 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:22 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 23:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 23:38 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:38 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:02 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:02 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:23 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:23 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:17 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:17 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 23:21 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 23:21 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 23:14 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:14 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-25 0:03 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 0:03 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 1:39 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-25 1:39 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-25 10:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-25 10:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-25 11:44 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-02-25 11:44 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 12:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-25 12:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-25 13:58 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 13:58 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 12:16 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 12:16 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 23:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 23:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-25 0:06 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 0:06 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: fsl: correct get_dma_channel parameter name Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-27 20:27 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 20:27 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 12:34 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 12:34 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] ASoC: fsl: align mpc8610_hpcd with p1022_ds on getting codec node Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-27 20:31 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 20:31 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: Remove unnecessary -codec from cs4270 driver name Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-27 21:21 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:21 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] ASoC: fsl: create fsl_utils to accommodate the common functions Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-27 18:15 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 18:15 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:36 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:36 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 2:15 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-28 2:15 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-28 16:51 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 16:51 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: fsl: use platform_device_id table to match p1022_ds device Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-27 21:39 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:39 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:39 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:39 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 1:52 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 1:52 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: fsl: check property 'compatible' for the machine name Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 14:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 14:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-24 16:30 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 16:30 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-25 0:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 0:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 11:39 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 11:39 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 1:28 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 1:28 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 11:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 11:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 13:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 13:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-25 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-25 14:03 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-25 14:03 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-24 16:32 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 16:32 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:23 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 23:23 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-24 23:22 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-24 23:22 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:54 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 21:54 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-28 1:50 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 1:50 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 2:12 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-28 2:12 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-28 3:13 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 3:13 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 3:42 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-28 3:42 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-28 5:35 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-28 5:35 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-27 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl Timur Tabi
2012-02-27 20:28 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120225114414.GC3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=B04825@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.