All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die()
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:34:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120228223447.GE18901@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gxLJOY8HzMO71dHTr8VfQ+G=KJP+wv5SwvrktTi7b82+A@mail.gmail.com>

* Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120223 00:09]:
> 2012/2/23 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0):
> >> Section mismatch in reference from the function
> >> platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu()
> >> The function platform_cpu_die() references
> >> the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu().
> >> This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit
> >> annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick
> >> just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit
> > s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/
> >
> > Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe:
> >
> >        Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of
> >        the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit.
> >
> > (But note I'm not a native speaker, too)
> >
> Thanks for fixing the grammar. :)
> Updated patch below with comments corrected as per
> your suggestion.

Thanks applying both into fixes-non-critical.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die()
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:34:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120228223447.GE18901@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gxLJOY8HzMO71dHTr8VfQ+G=KJP+wv5SwvrktTi7b82+A@mail.gmail.com>

* Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120223 00:09]:
> 2012/2/23 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0):
> >> Section mismatch in reference from the function
> >> platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu()
> >> The function platform_cpu_die() references
> >> the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu().
> >> This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit
> >> annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick
> >> just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit
> > s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/
> >
> > Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe:
> >
> > ? ? ? ?Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of
> > ? ? ? ?the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit.
> >
> > (But note I'm not a native speaker, too)
> >
> Thanks for fixing the grammar. :)
> Updated patch below with comments corrected as per
> your suggestion.

Thanks applying both into fixes-non-critical.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-28 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-23  6:58 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: Section mismatch warning fixes Santosh Shilimkar
2012-02-23  6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-02-23  6:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: fix section mismatch warning for omap4_hotplug_cpu() Santosh Shilimkar
2012-02-23  6:58   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-02-23  6:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() Santosh Shilimkar
2012-02-23  6:58   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-02-23  7:45   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-23  7:45     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-23  8:40     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-23  8:40       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-28 22:34       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-02-28 22:34         ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120228223447.GE18901@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.