* [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: Section mismatch warning fixes @ 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tony; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, Santosh Shilimkar Tony, Below are couple of section mismatch warning fixes for v3.3-rc5 Santosh Shilimkar (2): ARM: OMAP: fix section mismatch warning for omap4_hotplug_cpu() ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: Section mismatch warning fixes @ 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Tony, Below are couple of section mismatch warning fixes for v3.3-rc5 Santosh Shilimkar (2): ARM: OMAP: fix section mismatch warning for omap4_hotplug_cpu() ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: fix section mismatch warning for omap4_hotplug_cpu() 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tony; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, Santosh Shilimkar WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.text+0x8b80): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap4_hotplug_cpu() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap_secondary_startup() The function omap4_hotplug_cpu() references the function __cpuinit omap_secondary_startup(). This is often because omap4_hotplug_cpu lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap_secondary_startup is wrong. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c index 1d5d010..fe9ab7c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int omap4_enter_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) * @cpu : CPU ID * @power_state: CPU low power state. */ -int omap4_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) +int __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) { unsigned int cpu_state = 0; -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: fix section mismatch warning for omap4_hotplug_cpu() @ 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.text+0x8b80): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap4_hotplug_cpu() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap_secondary_startup() The function omap4_hotplug_cpu() references the function __cpuinit omap_secondary_startup(). This is often because omap4_hotplug_cpu lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap_secondary_startup is wrong. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c index 1d5d010..fe9ab7c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int omap4_enter_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) * @cpu : CPU ID * @power_state: CPU low power state. */ -int omap4_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) +int __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) { unsigned int cpu_state = 0; -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tony; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, Santosh Shilimkar WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): Section mismatch in reference from the function platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() The function platform_cpu_die() references the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit usage was definitely wrong to fix this warning.. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c index adbe4d8..56c345b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU * Called with IRQs disabled */ -void platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +void __ref platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int this_cpu; -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() @ 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): Section mismatch in reference from the function platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() The function platform_cpu_die() references the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit usage was definitely wrong to fix this warning.. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c index adbe4d8..56c345b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU * Called with IRQs disabled */ -void platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +void __ref platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int this_cpu; -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-02-23 7:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2012-02-23 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Santosh Shilimkar; +Cc: tony, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel Hello, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): > Section mismatch in reference from the function > platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() > The function platform_cpu_die() references > the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). > This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit > annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. > > Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick > just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/ Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe: Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. (But note I'm not a native speaker, too) Uwe > usage was definitely wrong to fix this warning.. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() @ 2012-02-23 7:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2012-02-23 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hello, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): > Section mismatch in reference from the function > platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() > The function platform_cpu_die() references > the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). > This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit > annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. > > Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick > just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/ Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe: Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. (But note I'm not a native speaker, too) Uwe > usage was definitely wrong to fix this warning.. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() 2012-02-23 7:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König @ 2012-02-23 8:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Shilimkar, Santosh @ 2012-02-23 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: tony, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2474 bytes --] 2012/2/23 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>: > Hello, > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): >> Section mismatch in reference from the function >> platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() >> The function platform_cpu_die() references >> the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). >> This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit >> annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. >> >> Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick >> just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit > s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/ > > Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe: > > Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of > the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. > > (But note I'm not a native speaker, too) > Thanks for fixing the grammar. :) Updated patch below with comments corrected as per your suggestion. Regards Santosh >From a53dd2d822dc9c9894c2f2f3d239af341c66d891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:10:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): Section mismatch in reference from the function platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() The function platform_cpu_die() references the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c index adbe4d8..56c345b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU * Called with IRQs disabled */ -void platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +void __ref platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int this_cpu; -- 1.7.4.1 [-- Attachment #2: 0002-ARM-OMAP-Fix-section-mismatch-warning-for-platform_c.patch --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1343 bytes --] From a53dd2d822dc9c9894c2f2f3d239af341c66d891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:10:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): Section mismatch in reference from the function platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() The function platform_cpu_die() references the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c index adbe4d8..56c345b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU * Called with IRQs disabled */ -void platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +void __ref platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int this_cpu; -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() @ 2012-02-23 8:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Shilimkar, Santosh @ 2012-02-23 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel 2012/2/23 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>: > Hello, > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): >> Section mismatch in reference from the function >> platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() >> The function platform_cpu_die() references >> the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). >> This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit >> annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. >> >> Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick >> just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit > s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/ > > Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe: > > ? ? ? ?Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of > ? ? ? ?the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. > > (But note I'm not a native speaker, too) > Thanks for fixing the grammar. :) Updated patch below with comments corrected as per your suggestion. Regards Santosh >From a53dd2d822dc9c9894c2f2f3d239af341c66d891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:10:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): Section mismatch in reference from the function platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() The function platform_cpu_die() references the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c index adbe4d8..56c345b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-hotplug.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU * Called with IRQs disabled */ -void platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +void __ref platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) { unsigned int this_cpu; -- 1.7.4.1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0002-ARM-OMAP-Fix-section-mismatch-warning-for-platform_c.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1343 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120223/148fa317/attachment.obj> ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() 2012-02-23 8:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh @ 2012-02-28 22:34 ` Tony Lindgren -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Tony Lindgren @ 2012-02-28 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shilimkar, Santosh; +Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel * Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120223 00:09]: > 2012/2/23 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>: > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): > >> Section mismatch in reference from the function > >> platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() > >> The function platform_cpu_die() references > >> the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). > >> This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit > >> annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. > >> > >> Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick > >> just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit > > s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/ > > > > Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe: > > > > Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of > > the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. > > > > (But note I'm not a native speaker, too) > > > Thanks for fixing the grammar. :) > Updated patch below with comments corrected as per > your suggestion. Thanks applying both into fixes-non-critical. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() @ 2012-02-28 22:34 ` Tony Lindgren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Tony Lindgren @ 2012-02-28 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel * Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120223 00:09]: > 2012/2/23 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>: > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x226d0): > >> Section mismatch in reference from the function > >> platform_cpu_die() to the function .cpuinit.text:omap4_hotplug_cpu() > >> The function platform_cpu_die() references > >> the function __cpuinit omap4_hotplug_cpu(). > >> This is often because platform_cpu_die lacks a __cpuinit > >> annotation or the annotation of omap4_hotplug_cpu is wrong. > >> > >> Thanks to Russell King for suggesting __ref annotation trick > >> just like it's parent function for this warning becasue __cupinit > > s/it's/its/; s/becasue/because/; s/cup/cpu/ > > > > Having said that I think the grammar is broken, too. Maybe: > > > > ? ? ? ?Thanks to Russell King for suggesting to use __ref instead of > > ? ? ? ?the initial (and wrong) approach to use __cpuinit. > > > > (But note I'm not a native speaker, too) > > > Thanks for fixing the grammar. :) > Updated patch below with comments corrected as per > your suggestion. Thanks applying both into fixes-non-critical. Regards, Tony ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-28 22:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-02-23 6:58 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: Section mismatch warning fixes Santosh Shilimkar 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2012-02-23 6:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: fix section mismatch warning for omap4_hotplug_cpu() Santosh Shilimkar 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2012-02-23 6:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: Fix section mismatch warning for platform_cpu_die() Santosh Shilimkar 2012-02-23 6:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2012-02-23 7:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2012-02-23 7:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König 2012-02-23 8:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-02-23 8:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-02-28 22:34 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-02-28 22:34 ` Tony Lindgren
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.