From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:34:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312143400.GA23113@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120311233615.GD10787@dztty>
On 03/12, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 06:25:12PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Well, I don't think it is right to add this counter into task_struct.
> >
> > It should be per-process, signal_struct makes more sense. Or may be
> > mm_struct.
> Some /proc/<pid>/{syscall,stack,...} do not operate on mm_struct so why we
> should add the: "acquire a reference to mm, get exec_id and mmput".
This could be simpler, just read the counter under task_lock(). And
unless I misread the next patches syscall/stack can use current->mm
lockless.
OK, nevermind.
> For the signal_struct currently I don't know, from a comment it seems that
> signal_struct can be shared!
Yes, it is shared, and that is why it makes sense for the per-process
data. All threads in the thread group (process) have the same ->signal.
And unlike ->mm, ->signal survives after exec.
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:34:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312143400.GA23113@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120311233615.GD10787@dztty>
On 03/12, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 06:25:12PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Well, I don't think it is right to add this counter into task_struct.
> >
> > It should be per-process, signal_struct makes more sense. Or may be
> > mm_struct.
> Some /proc/<pid>/{syscall,stack,...} do not operate on mm_struct so why we
> should add the: "acquire a reference to mm, get exec_id and mmput".
This could be simpler, just read the counter under task_lock(). And
unless I misread the next patches syscall/stack can use current->mm
lockless.
OK, nevermind.
> For the signal_struct currently I don't know, from a comment it seems that
> signal_struct can be shared!
Yes, it is shared, and that is why it makes sense for the per-process
data. All threads in the thread group (process) have the same ->signal.
And unlike ->mm, ->signal survives after exec.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-10 23:25 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 0:12 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:36 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:58 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 8:24 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2012-03-11 8:24 ` Solar Designer
2012-03-11 9:56 ` [kernel-hardening] " Ingo Molnar
2012-03-11 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-11 14:03 ` [kernel-hardening] " Alan Cox
2012-03-11 14:03 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-11 17:15 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 17:15 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:39 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:39 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 9:40 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2012-03-11 9:40 ` Solar Designer
2012-03-11 17:25 ` [kernel-hardening] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 17:49 ` [kernel-hardening] self_exec_id/parent_exec_id && CLONE_PARENT Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 17:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 18:02 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 18:37 ` [kernel-hardening] " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-03-11 18:37 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-03-11 18:39 ` [kernel-hardening] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 18:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 18:55 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/1] (Was: self_exec_id/parent_exec_id && CLONE_PARENT) Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 18:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 18:55 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 1/1] CLONE_PARENT shouldn't allow to set ->exit_signal Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 18:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-18 18:25 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-18 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-18 20:53 ` [kernel-hardening] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-18 20:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20120314190939.GC14172@redhat.com>
2012-03-19 16:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] exec_id/exit_signal fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] exit_signal: simplify the "we have changed execution domain" logic Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] exit_signal: fix the "parent has changed security " Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-19 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] exec: move de_thread()->setmax_mm_hiwater_rss() into exec_mmap() Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 22:48 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 23:32 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 23:32 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 23:42 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-12 0:25 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 0:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 10:11 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2012-03-12 10:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-12 10:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-12 14:01 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 14:01 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 14:01 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 23:36 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 23:36 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 14:34 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-03-12 14:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 2/9] proc: add proc_file_private struct to store private information Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/9] proc: new proc_exec_id_ok() helper function Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 4/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* INF files from reader across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 5/9] proc: add protection support for /proc/<pid>/* ONE files Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 6/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* ONE files from reader across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 7/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/{maps,smaps,numa_maps} Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 8/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/{environ,pagemap} across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:05 ` [kernel-hardening] " Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-11 8:05 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-11 17:01 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 17:01 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 9/9] proc: improve and clean up /proc/<pid>/mem protection Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 0:01 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:27 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 0:27 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:46 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:46 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 10:35 ` [kernel-hardening] exec_id protection from bad child exit signals (was: Re: [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve) Solar Designer
2012-03-11 10:35 ` Solar Designer
2012-03-11 18:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-12 19:13 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 19:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 20:44 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 20:44 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 21:47 ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 21:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 22:41 ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 22:41 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 23:10 ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 23:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120312143400.GA23113@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=tixxdz@opendz.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wilsons@start.ca \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.