All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, tony@atomide.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:34:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312173425.A6B893E07B0@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gzdfxJms8cc3VhsVzhGq4f8x1QeY6LU6X+2eFZ4_Yv_bw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:56:33 +0530, "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma
> <tarun.kanti@ti.com> wrote:
> > The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{}
> > as we already have them as part of bank->context now. Also, remove un-used
> > variable from gpio_irq_handler.
> >
> > The fix include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation and fix
> > type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter.
> >
> > It is baselined on top of Kevin's following series:
> > gpio/omap: cleanup and runtime PM conversion for v3.4
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup
> >
> > I have applied Benoit's GPIO patches in following series on top of Kevin's
> > before applying my changes.
> > gpio/omap: Cleanup and adaptation to Device Tree
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git for_3.4/dt_gpio
> >
> > Series is available here for reference:
> > git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_further_cleanup_fixes
> >
> > Power Test: Off-mode and Retention on OMAP3430 (Suspend and Idle paths).
> > Functional Test: OMAP2430, OMAP3430SDP, ZOOM3, OMAP4430, OMAP4-BLAZE
> >
> > Tarun Kanti DebBarma (6):
> >  gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect fields
> >  gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> >  gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> >  gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
> >  gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
> >  gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   56 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> >  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> Nice clean-up series. I have gone through this series one more time
> Thanks for updating change-logs. I noticed you dropped the edge triggered
> irq wakeup fix....I see on the list now.... Kevin has fixed that already.
> 
> Series looks good to me. You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

What's the status of this series?  Should I be expecting a v2?  Or am I supposed
to pick up this one? (a pull req would make things easier for me)

g.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:34:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312173425.A6B893E07B0@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gzdfxJms8cc3VhsVzhGq4f8x1QeY6LU6X+2eFZ4_Yv_bw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:56:33 +0530, "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma
> <tarun.kanti@ti.com> wrote:
> > The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{}
> > as we already have them as part of bank->context now. Also, remove un-used
> > variable from gpio_irq_handler.
> >
> > The fix include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation and fix
> > type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter.
> >
> > It is baselined on top of Kevin's following series:
> > gpio/omap: cleanup and runtime PM conversion for v3.4
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup
> >
> > I have applied Benoit's GPIO patches in following series on top of Kevin's
> > before applying my changes.
> > gpio/omap: Cleanup and adaptation to Device Tree
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git for_3.4/dt_gpio
> >
> > Series is available here for reference:
> > git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_further_cleanup_fixes
> >
> > Power Test: Off-mode and Retention on OMAP3430 (Suspend and Idle paths).
> > Functional Test: OMAP2430, OMAP3430SDP, ZOOM3, OMAP4430, OMAP4-BLAZE
> >
> > Tarun Kanti DebBarma (6):
> > ??gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect fields
> > ??gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> > ??gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> > ??gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
> > ??gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
> > ??gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation
> >
> > ??drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | ?? 56 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > ??1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> Nice clean-up series. I have gone through this series one more time
> Thanks for updating change-logs. I noticed you dropped the edge triggered
> irq wakeup fix....I see on the list now.... Kevin has fixed that already.
> 
> Series looks good to me. You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

What's the status of this series?  Should I be expecting a v2?  Or am I supposed
to pick up this one? (a pull req would make things easier for me)

g.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, tony@atomide.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:34:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312173425.A6B893E07B0@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gzdfxJms8cc3VhsVzhGq4f8x1QeY6LU6X+2eFZ4_Yv_bw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:56:33 +0530, "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma
> <tarun.kanti@ti.com> wrote:
> > The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{}
> > as we already have them as part of bank->context now. Also, remove un-used
> > variable from gpio_irq_handler.
> >
> > The fix include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation and fix
> > type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter.
> >
> > It is baselined on top of Kevin's following series:
> > gpio/omap: cleanup and runtime PM conversion for v3.4
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup
> >
> > I have applied Benoit's GPIO patches in following series on top of Kevin's
> > before applying my changes.
> > gpio/omap: Cleanup and adaptation to Device Tree
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git for_3.4/dt_gpio
> >
> > Series is available here for reference:
> > git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_further_cleanup_fixes
> >
> > Power Test: Off-mode and Retention on OMAP3430 (Suspend and Idle paths).
> > Functional Test: OMAP2430, OMAP3430SDP, ZOOM3, OMAP4430, OMAP4-BLAZE
> >
> > Tarun Kanti DebBarma (6):
> >  gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect fields
> >  gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> >  gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> >  gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
> >  gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
> >  gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   56 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> >  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> Nice clean-up series. I have gone through this series one more time
> Thanks for updating change-logs. I noticed you dropped the edge triggered
> irq wakeup fix....I see on the list now.... Kevin has fixed that already.
> 
> Series looks good to me. You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

What's the status of this series?  Should I be expecting a v2?  Or am I supposed
to pick up this one? (a pull req would make things easier for me)

g.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-12 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-23 12:10 [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect fields Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:28   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:28     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:28   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:28     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-27 23:50   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:50     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:50     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  5:08     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28  5:08       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28  5:08       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup " Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:29   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:29     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-27 23:54   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:54     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:54     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  9:39     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28  9:39       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28  9:39       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 11:15       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 11:15         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 11:15         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 18:45       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 18:45         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 18:45         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-29  4:18         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-29  4:18           ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:30   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:30     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-28  0:02   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  0:02     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  0:02     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  5:11     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28  5:11       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:30   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:30     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:39   ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-02-23 12:39     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-02-23 12:46     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 12:46       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:31     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-28  0:11   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  0:11     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28  0:11     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-23 12:26   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-03-12 17:34   ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-03-12 17:34     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:34     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 18:42     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:42       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:42       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:43       ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 18:43         ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 18:43         ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120312173425.A6B893E07B0@localhost \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.