From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
tony@atomide.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:02:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87linnu8o8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329999031-6914-5-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:40:29 +0530")
Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:
> This local variable is just assigned zero and then OR'ed
> with isr. It does not appear to serve any purpose and so
> removing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Looks like the use of this was removed when I moved things over to using
the generic IRQ framework, but I didn't fully clean up.
Can you update the changelog to something along the lines of:
"commit 672e302e3c (ARM: OMAP: use edge/level handlers from generic IRQ
framework) removed retrigger support in favor of using generic IRQ
framework. This patch cleans up some unused remnants of that removal.
Thanks,
Kevin
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index b62e861..3dd4b3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -623,7 +623,6 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> u32 isr;
> unsigned int gpio_irq, gpio_index;
> struct gpio_bank *bank;
> - u32 retrigger = 0;
> int unmasked = 0;
> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>
> @@ -660,8 +659,6 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
>
> - isr |= retrigger;
> - retrigger = 0;
> if (!isr)
> break;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:02:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87linnu8o8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329999031-6914-5-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:40:29 +0530")
Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:
> This local variable is just assigned zero and then OR'ed
> with isr. It does not appear to serve any purpose and so
> removing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Looks like the use of this was removed when I moved things over to using
the generic IRQ framework, but I didn't fully clean up.
Can you update the changelog to something along the lines of:
"commit 672e302e3c (ARM: OMAP: use edge/level handlers from generic IRQ
framework) removed retrigger support in favor of using generic IRQ
framework. This patch cleans up some unused remnants of that removal.
Thanks,
Kevin
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index b62e861..3dd4b3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -623,7 +623,6 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> u32 isr;
> unsigned int gpio_irq, gpio_index;
> struct gpio_bank *bank;
> - u32 retrigger = 0;
> int unmasked = 0;
> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>
> @@ -660,8 +659,6 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
>
> - isr |= retrigger;
> - retrigger = 0;
> if (!isr)
> break;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
<tony@atomide.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:02:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87linnu8o8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329999031-6914-5-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:40:29 +0530")
Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:
> This local variable is just assigned zero and then OR'ed
> with isr. It does not appear to serve any purpose and so
> removing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Looks like the use of this was removed when I moved things over to using
the generic IRQ framework, but I didn't fully clean up.
Can you update the changelog to something along the lines of:
"commit 672e302e3c (ARM: OMAP: use edge/level handlers from generic IRQ
framework) removed retrigger support in favor of using generic IRQ
framework. This patch cleans up some unused remnants of that removal.
Thanks,
Kevin
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index b62e861..3dd4b3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -623,7 +623,6 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> u32 isr;
> unsigned int gpio_irq, gpio_index;
> struct gpio_bank *bank;
> - u32 retrigger = 0;
> int unmasked = 0;
> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>
> @@ -660,8 +659,6 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
>
> - isr |= retrigger;
> - retrigger = 0;
> if (!isr)
> break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 12:10 [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect fields Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-27 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 5:08 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 5:08 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 5:08 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup " Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-27 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-27 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 9:39 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 9:39 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 9:39 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 11:15 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 11:15 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 11:15 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 18:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 18:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 18:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-29 4:18 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-29 4:18 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-28 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-02-28 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 5:11 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-28 5:11 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:39 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-02-23 12:39 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-02-23 12:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 12:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 12:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:10 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-23 12:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-23 12:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-28 0:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 0:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-28 0:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-23 12:26 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-03-12 17:34 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:34 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:34 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 18:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:43 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 18:43 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 18:43 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87linnu8o8.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.