All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:33:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313083310.GA27560@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313061622.GA24357@elte.hu>

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:16:22AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Russell,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm tree got a conflict in
> > kernel/sched/core.c between commit 8c79a045fd59 ("sched/events: Revert
> > trace_sched_stat_sleeptime()") from Linus' tree and commit 1cf00341547a
> > ("sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler hook")
> > from the arm tree.
> > 
> > Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
> 
> This commit seems simple enough and has PeterZ's ack, but if 
> there are more scheduler patches coming in this area then please 
> send it to the scheduler tree first: we can create a pullable, 
> stable topic branch for it which the ARM tree can then use.
> 
> That approach would also avoid conflicts as a side effect.

Please check your mailbox:

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:22:27 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
        scheduler hook

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:57:48 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
        scheduler hook

Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:42:27 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
        scheduler hook

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-13  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-13  0:08 linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13  6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13  8:33   ` Russell King [this message]
2012-03-13  8:36     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13  8:47       ` Russell King
2012-03-13  8:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13  9:00           ` Russell King
2012-03-13  9:26             ` [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13  9:50               ` Russell King
2012-03-13 10:19                 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 11:27                   ` Russell King
2012-03-13 11:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:00                       ` Russell King
2012-03-13 12:20                         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:36                           ` Russell King
2012-03-13 13:02                             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:17                       ` Russell King
2012-03-13 12:44                         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 13:04                           ` Russell King
2012-03-13 13:31                             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 15:47                               ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-30 13:52                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-30 14:25                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-30 17:21                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-13 11:11               ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-13  8:48     ` linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13  8:58       ` Russell King
2012-03-13  9:06         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13  9:09           ` Russell King
2012-03-13  9:11           ` Russell King
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-26 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-08 22:35 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-27 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-27 23:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-28  7:01   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-30  8:41     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-30  8:51       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-30  9:17         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-30  9:53           ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-30 10:25           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-06-01  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-01  8:52 ` Russell King
2012-03-30  0:11 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-26  0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-29 23:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-08 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-08 23:53 linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-08 23:53 linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 23:08 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-21  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-21  9:31 ` Linus Walleij
2010-07-13  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-03 23:49 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-04  1:16 ` Eric Miao
2010-03-03 23:33 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-31  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-31  0:41 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-07-31  0:41   ` H Hartley Sweeten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120313083310.GA27560@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.