From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313154716.GA31293@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313133115.GA21634@elte.hu>
Anyway - regardless of any differences and flames about workflow
details, both you and Catalin should still feel free to use both
the original commit (1cf00341547a) or the tip:sched/arch branch
I provided (01f23e1630d9).
[ At the end of the merge window I'll try to make sure that at
least one of them got upstream ;-) ]
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-13 0:08 linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 8:33 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 8:47 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:00 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 9:26 ` [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:50 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 11:27 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:00 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 12:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:36 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:17 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 13:04 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-03-30 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-30 14:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-30 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-13 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-13 8:48 ` linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 8:58 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:09 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 9:11 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313154716.GA31293@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.