From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:11:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313111126.GC26370@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313092649.GA15406@elte.hu>
Hi Ingo,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:26:49AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> As I said it in my first mail, doing that is unnecessary - but
> if you insist on being difficult then Catalin, feel free to pull
> the patch from tip:sched/arch:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/arch
>
> HEAD: 01f23e1630 sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback
>
> it's v3.3-rc7 based so it will generate no conflict with
> linux-next. It only contains this commit so you can use it
> without pulling in other pending scheduler changes.
Thanks for merging the scheduler hook.
So I'll send Russell another pull request after the 3.4-rc1, containing
only ARM patches. The only drawback is that the removal of
__ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW will have to wait another release cycle.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-13 0:08 linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 8:33 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 8:47 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:00 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 9:26 ` [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:50 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 11:27 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:00 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 12:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:36 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 12:17 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 13:04 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-30 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-30 14:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-30 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-13 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2012-03-13 8:48 ` linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 8:58 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:09 ` Russell King
2012-03-13 9:11 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313111126.GC26370@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.