From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Ren Mingxin <renmx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Tokunaga Kei <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
UDEV <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio_blk: Checking "private_data" to avoid kernel panic when hotplugging
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:11:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328111115.GE6194@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F728831.2090406@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:40:33AM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On guest with upstream's kernel(3.3.0-rc7), I
> mounted virtblk as:
> a) # mkfs /dev/vda
> b) # mount /dev/vda /mnt
> c) # cd /mnt
>
> Then I did hotplug for virtblk via virsh on host as:
> a) # sudo virsh detach-disk guest vda
> b) # sudo virsh attach-disk guest /media/data/test.img vda
Did a quick test and I don't seem to see a panic.
How reproducible is this for you?
> I encountered guest's kernel panic (*probability *
> *event*)whose backtrace liked this:
>
> PID: 2496 TASK: ffff88001f5de080 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "blkid"
> #0 [ffff88001afdbb00] machine_kexec at ffffffff81031fcb
> #1 [ffff88001afdbb60] crash_kexec at ffffffff810b8f72
> #2 [ffff88001afdbc30] oops_end at ffffffff814f04b0
> #3 [ffff88001afdbc60] die at ffffffff8100f26b
> #4 [ffff88001afdbc90] do_general_protection at ffffffff814f0042
> #5 [ffff88001afdbcc0] general_protection at ffffffff814ef815
> [exception RIP: virtio_check_driver_offered_feature+27]
> RIP: ffffffffa00540cb RSP: ffff88001afdbd78 RFLAGS: 00010206
> RAX: ffffffff810ffde0 RBX: ffff88001f14a800 RCX: 000000004cf0758b
> RDX: 4ce86d8b4ce0658b RSI: 0000000000000007 RDI: ffffffff81a970a0
> RBP: ffff88001afdbd78 R8: ffffffffa009d060 R9: 0000000000000100
> R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000101d
> R13: 0000000000005331 R14: ffffffff81a970a0 R15: 0000000000000000
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
> #6 [ffff88001afdbd80] virtblk_ioctl at ffffffffa009c459 [virtio_blk]
> #7 [ffff88001afdbdc0] __blkdev_driver_ioctl at ffffffff81257317
> #8 [ffff88001afdbe00] blkdev_ioctl at ffffffff8125779d
> #9 [ffff88001afdbe50] block_ioctl at ffffffff811aec5c
> #10 [ffff88001afdbe60] vfs_ioctl at ffffffff81189342
> #11 [ffff88001afdbea0] do_vfs_ioctl at ffffffff811894e4
> #12 [ffff88001afdbf30] sys_ioctl at ffffffff81189a61
> #13 [ffff88001afdbf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8100b0f2
> RIP: 0000003f566dd847 RSP: 00007fffa23e6130 RFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: ffffffff8100b0f2 RCX: 0000000000000008
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000005331 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 0000000040000000 R8: 0000003f5699b580 R9: 0000000000000100
> R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000003f59020ba0 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 000000000241f030
> ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
>
> This panic was triggered by the command of "blkid" in
> udev's rule "60-persistent-storage.rules".
The weird thing is, we should not get any ioctls
before add_disk is called.
>
> So, when the virtblk was reattached, command "blkid"
> probed filesystem metadata of disks. At that moment,
> virtblk_ioctl() was called, but the data of "virtio_blk"
> "bdev->bd_disk->private_data" pointing to may not be
> updated for the sync reason.
Sorry, what does "for the sync reason" mean?
private_data seems to be set at device probe
and never changed.
> This patch do this check to avoid panic.
>
> Any comment will be appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> virtio_blk.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index c4a60ba..4ac81f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,12 @@ static int virtblk_ioctl(struct block_device
> *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = disk->private_data;
>
> /*
> + * Check whether the private data pointer has been updated.
> + */
> + if (vblk != vblk->vdev->priv)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
I would change this to
BUG_ON(vblk != vblk->vdev->priv);
Add traces to virtblk_probe/virtblk_remove
and see where the bad device came from.
> + /*
> * Only allow the generic SCSI ioctls if the host can support it.
> */
> if (!virtio_has_feature(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI))
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ren
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Ren Mingxin <renmx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Tokunaga Kei <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
UDEV <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio_blk: Checking "private_data" to avoid kernel panic when hotplugging
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:11:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328111115.GE6194@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F728831.2090406@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:40:33AM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On guest with upstream's kernel(3.3.0-rc7), I
> mounted virtblk as:
> a) # mkfs /dev/vda
> b) # mount /dev/vda /mnt
> c) # cd /mnt
>
> Then I did hotplug for virtblk via virsh on host as:
> a) # sudo virsh detach-disk guest vda
> b) # sudo virsh attach-disk guest /media/data/test.img vda
Did a quick test and I don't seem to see a panic.
How reproducible is this for you?
> I encountered guest's kernel panic (*probability *
> *event*)whose backtrace liked this:
>
> PID: 2496 TASK: ffff88001f5de080 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "blkid"
> #0 [ffff88001afdbb00] machine_kexec at ffffffff81031fcb
> #1 [ffff88001afdbb60] crash_kexec at ffffffff810b8f72
> #2 [ffff88001afdbc30] oops_end at ffffffff814f04b0
> #3 [ffff88001afdbc60] die at ffffffff8100f26b
> #4 [ffff88001afdbc90] do_general_protection at ffffffff814f0042
> #5 [ffff88001afdbcc0] general_protection at ffffffff814ef815
> [exception RIP: virtio_check_driver_offered_feature+27]
> RIP: ffffffffa00540cb RSP: ffff88001afdbd78 RFLAGS: 00010206
> RAX: ffffffff810ffde0 RBX: ffff88001f14a800 RCX: 000000004cf0758b
> RDX: 4ce86d8b4ce0658b RSI: 0000000000000007 RDI: ffffffff81a970a0
> RBP: ffff88001afdbd78 R8: ffffffffa009d060 R9: 0000000000000100
> R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000101d
> R13: 0000000000005331 R14: ffffffff81a970a0 R15: 0000000000000000
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
> #6 [ffff88001afdbd80] virtblk_ioctl at ffffffffa009c459 [virtio_blk]
> #7 [ffff88001afdbdc0] __blkdev_driver_ioctl at ffffffff81257317
> #8 [ffff88001afdbe00] blkdev_ioctl at ffffffff8125779d
> #9 [ffff88001afdbe50] block_ioctl at ffffffff811aec5c
> #10 [ffff88001afdbe60] vfs_ioctl at ffffffff81189342
> #11 [ffff88001afdbea0] do_vfs_ioctl at ffffffff811894e4
> #12 [ffff88001afdbf30] sys_ioctl at ffffffff81189a61
> #13 [ffff88001afdbf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8100b0f2
> RIP: 0000003f566dd847 RSP: 00007fffa23e6130 RFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: ffffffff8100b0f2 RCX: 0000000000000008
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000005331 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 0000000040000000 R8: 0000003f5699b580 R9: 0000000000000100
> R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000003f59020ba0 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 000000000241f030
> ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
>
> This panic was triggered by the command of "blkid" in
> udev's rule "60-persistent-storage.rules".
The weird thing is, we should not get any ioctls
before add_disk is called.
>
> So, when the virtblk was reattached, command "blkid"
> probed filesystem metadata of disks. At that moment,
> virtblk_ioctl() was called, but the data of "virtio_blk"
> "bdev->bd_disk->private_data" pointing to may not be
> updated for the sync reason.
Sorry, what does "for the sync reason" mean?
private_data seems to be set at device probe
and never changed.
> This patch do this check to avoid panic.
>
> Any comment will be appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> virtio_blk.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index c4a60ba..4ac81f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,12 @@ static int virtblk_ioctl(struct block_device
> *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = disk->private_data;
>
> /*
> + * Check whether the private data pointer has been updated.
> + */
> + if (vblk != vblk->vdev->priv)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
I would change this to
BUG_ON(vblk != vblk->vdev->priv);
Add traces to virtblk_probe/virtblk_remove
and see where the bad device came from.
> + /*
> * Only allow the generic SCSI ioctls if the host can support it.
> */
> if (!virtio_has_feature(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI))
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ren
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 3:40 [RFC PATCH] virtio_blk: Checking "private_data" to avoid kernel panic when hotplugging Ren Mingxin
2012-03-28 3:40 ` Ren Mingxin
2012-03-28 11:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-03-28 11:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-29 4:11 ` Ren Mingxin
2012-03-29 4:11 ` Ren Mingxin
2012-03-29 10:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-29 10:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-04-09 7:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-04-09 7:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-04-11 3:17 ` Ren Mingxin
2012-04-11 3:17 ` Ren Mingxin
2012-04-11 8:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-04-11 8:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-04-11 9:09 ` Ren Mingxin
2012-04-11 9:09 ` Ren Mingxin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120328111115.GE6194@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renmx@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.