From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:13:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328131153.382173637@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120328121308.568545879@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-io-controller.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4945 bytes --]
A bare per-cgroup buffered write IO controller.
Basically, when there are N dd tasks running in the blkcg,
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit will be balanced around
blkcg->buffered_write_bps / N
and each blkcg task will be throttled under
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit
or
min(blkcg->dirty_ratelimit, bdi->dirty_ratelimit)
when there are other dirtier tasks in the system.
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
CC: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 20 +++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:16.414093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:40:25.446088022 +0800
@@ -1145,6 +1145,54 @@ static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing
return pages >= DIRTY_POLL_THRESH ? 1 + t / 2 : t;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING
+static void blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ unsigned long dirtied,
+ unsigned long elapsed)
+{
+ unsigned long long bps = blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg);
+ unsigned long long ratelimit;
+ unsigned long dirty_rate;
+
+ dirty_rate = (dirtied - blkcg->dirtied_stamp) * HZ;
+ dirty_rate /= elapsed;
+
+ ratelimit = blkcg->dirty_ratelimit;
+ ratelimit *= div_u64(bps, dirty_rate + 1);
+ ratelimit = min(ratelimit, bps);
+ ratelimit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ blkcg->dirty_ratelimit = (blkcg->dirty_ratelimit + ratelimit) / 2 + 1;
+}
+
+void blkcg_update_bandwidth(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ unsigned long now = jiffies;
+ unsigned long dirtied;
+ unsigned long elapsed;
+
+ if (!blkcg)
+ return;
+ if (!spin_trylock(&blkcg->lock))
+ return;
+
+ elapsed = now - blkcg->bw_time_stamp;
+ dirtied = percpu_counter_read(&blkcg->nr_dirtied);
+
+ if (elapsed > MAX_PAUSE * 2)
+ goto snapshot;
+ if (elapsed <= MAX_PAUSE)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg, dirtied, elapsed);
+snapshot:
+ blkcg->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
+ blkcg->bw_time_stamp = now;
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty
* data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force
@@ -1174,6 +1222,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
unsigned long pos_ratio;
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
+ struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
for (;;) {
unsigned long now = jiffies;
@@ -1198,6 +1247,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(dirty_thresh,
background_thresh);
if (nr_dirty <= freerun) {
+ if (blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg))
+ goto blkcg_bps;
current->dirty_paused_when = now;
current->nr_dirtied = 0;
current->nr_dirtied_pause =
@@ -1263,6 +1314,14 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
task_ratelimit = (u64)task_ratelimit *
blkcg_weight(blkcg) / BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT;
+ if (blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg) &&
+ task_ratelimit > blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg)) {
+blkcg_bps:
+ blkcg_update_bandwidth(blkcg);
+ dirty_ratelimit = blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg);
+ task_ratelimit = dirty_ratelimit;
+ }
+
max_pause = bdi_max_pause(bdi, bdi_dirty);
min_pause = bdi_min_pause(bdi, max_pause,
task_ratelimit, dirty_ratelimit,
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h 2012-03-28 15:36:16.414093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h 2012-03-28 15:39:46.730088815 +0800
@@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ struct blkio_cgroup {
struct hlist_head blkg_list;
struct list_head policy_list; /* list of blkio_policy_node */
struct percpu_counter nr_dirtied;
+ unsigned long bw_time_stamp;
+ unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
+ unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
+ unsigned long long buffered_write_bps;
};
struct blkio_group_stats {
@@ -217,6 +221,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blkcg_weight(
{
return blkcg->weight;
}
+static inline uint64_t blkcg_buffered_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return blkcg->buffered_write_bps;
+}
+static inline unsigned long blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return blkcg->dirty_ratelimit;
+}
typedef void (blkio_unlink_group_fn) (void *key, struct blkio_group *blkg);
@@ -272,6 +284,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blkcg_weight(
{
return BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT;
}
+static inline uint64_t blkcg_buffered_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline unsigned long blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:13:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328131153.382173637@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120328121308.568545879@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-io-controller.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4945 bytes --]
A bare per-cgroup buffered write IO controller.
Basically, when there are N dd tasks running in the blkcg,
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit will be balanced around
blkcg->buffered_write_bps / N
and each blkcg task will be throttled under
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit
or
min(blkcg->dirty_ratelimit, bdi->dirty_ratelimit)
when there are other dirtier tasks in the system.
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
CC: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 20 +++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:16.414093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:40:25.446088022 +0800
@@ -1145,6 +1145,54 @@ static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing
return pages >= DIRTY_POLL_THRESH ? 1 + t / 2 : t;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING
+static void blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ unsigned long dirtied,
+ unsigned long elapsed)
+{
+ unsigned long long bps = blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg);
+ unsigned long long ratelimit;
+ unsigned long dirty_rate;
+
+ dirty_rate = (dirtied - blkcg->dirtied_stamp) * HZ;
+ dirty_rate /= elapsed;
+
+ ratelimit = blkcg->dirty_ratelimit;
+ ratelimit *= div_u64(bps, dirty_rate + 1);
+ ratelimit = min(ratelimit, bps);
+ ratelimit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ blkcg->dirty_ratelimit = (blkcg->dirty_ratelimit + ratelimit) / 2 + 1;
+}
+
+void blkcg_update_bandwidth(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ unsigned long now = jiffies;
+ unsigned long dirtied;
+ unsigned long elapsed;
+
+ if (!blkcg)
+ return;
+ if (!spin_trylock(&blkcg->lock))
+ return;
+
+ elapsed = now - blkcg->bw_time_stamp;
+ dirtied = percpu_counter_read(&blkcg->nr_dirtied);
+
+ if (elapsed > MAX_PAUSE * 2)
+ goto snapshot;
+ if (elapsed <= MAX_PAUSE)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg, dirtied, elapsed);
+snapshot:
+ blkcg->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
+ blkcg->bw_time_stamp = now;
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty
* data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force
@@ -1174,6 +1222,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
unsigned long pos_ratio;
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
+ struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
for (;;) {
unsigned long now = jiffies;
@@ -1198,6 +1247,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(dirty_thresh,
background_thresh);
if (nr_dirty <= freerun) {
+ if (blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg))
+ goto blkcg_bps;
current->dirty_paused_when = now;
current->nr_dirtied = 0;
current->nr_dirtied_pause =
@@ -1263,6 +1314,14 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
task_ratelimit = (u64)task_ratelimit *
blkcg_weight(blkcg) / BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT;
+ if (blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg) &&
+ task_ratelimit > blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg)) {
+blkcg_bps:
+ blkcg_update_bandwidth(blkcg);
+ dirty_ratelimit = blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg);
+ task_ratelimit = dirty_ratelimit;
+ }
+
max_pause = bdi_max_pause(bdi, bdi_dirty);
min_pause = bdi_min_pause(bdi, max_pause,
task_ratelimit, dirty_ratelimit,
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h 2012-03-28 15:36:16.414093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h 2012-03-28 15:39:46.730088815 +0800
@@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ struct blkio_cgroup {
struct hlist_head blkg_list;
struct list_head policy_list; /* list of blkio_policy_node */
struct percpu_counter nr_dirtied;
+ unsigned long bw_time_stamp;
+ unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
+ unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
+ unsigned long long buffered_write_bps;
};
struct blkio_group_stats {
@@ -217,6 +221,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blkcg_weight(
{
return blkcg->weight;
}
+static inline uint64_t blkcg_buffered_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return blkcg->buffered_write_bps;
+}
+static inline unsigned long blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return blkcg->dirty_ratelimit;
+}
typedef void (blkio_unlink_group_fn) (void *key, struct blkio_group *blkg);
@@ -272,6 +284,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blkcg_weight(
{
return BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT;
}
+static inline uint64_t blkcg_buffered_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline unsigned long blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:13:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328131153.382173637@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120328121308.568545879@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-io-controller.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4642 bytes --]
A bare per-cgroup buffered write IO controller.
Basically, when there are N dd tasks running in the blkcg,
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit will be balanced around
blkcg->buffered_write_bps / N
and each blkcg task will be throttled under
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit
or
min(blkcg->dirty_ratelimit, bdi->dirty_ratelimit)
when there are other dirtier tasks in the system.
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
CC: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 20 +++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:16.414093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:40:25.446088022 +0800
@@ -1145,6 +1145,54 @@ static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing
return pages >= DIRTY_POLL_THRESH ? 1 + t / 2 : t;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING
+static void blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ unsigned long dirtied,
+ unsigned long elapsed)
+{
+ unsigned long long bps = blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg);
+ unsigned long long ratelimit;
+ unsigned long dirty_rate;
+
+ dirty_rate = (dirtied - blkcg->dirtied_stamp) * HZ;
+ dirty_rate /= elapsed;
+
+ ratelimit = blkcg->dirty_ratelimit;
+ ratelimit *= div_u64(bps, dirty_rate + 1);
+ ratelimit = min(ratelimit, bps);
+ ratelimit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ blkcg->dirty_ratelimit = (blkcg->dirty_ratelimit + ratelimit) / 2 + 1;
+}
+
+void blkcg_update_bandwidth(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ unsigned long now = jiffies;
+ unsigned long dirtied;
+ unsigned long elapsed;
+
+ if (!blkcg)
+ return;
+ if (!spin_trylock(&blkcg->lock))
+ return;
+
+ elapsed = now - blkcg->bw_time_stamp;
+ dirtied = percpu_counter_read(&blkcg->nr_dirtied);
+
+ if (elapsed > MAX_PAUSE * 2)
+ goto snapshot;
+ if (elapsed <= MAX_PAUSE)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg, dirtied, elapsed);
+snapshot:
+ blkcg->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
+ blkcg->bw_time_stamp = now;
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty
* data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force
@@ -1174,6 +1222,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
unsigned long pos_ratio;
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
+ struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = task_blkio_cgroup(current);
for (;;) {
unsigned long now = jiffies;
@@ -1198,6 +1247,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(dirty_thresh,
background_thresh);
if (nr_dirty <= freerun) {
+ if (blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg))
+ goto blkcg_bps;
current->dirty_paused_when = now;
current->nr_dirtied = 0;
current->nr_dirtied_pause =
@@ -1263,6 +1314,14 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
task_ratelimit = (u64)task_ratelimit *
blkcg_weight(blkcg) / BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT;
+ if (blkcg_buffered_write_bps(blkcg) &&
+ task_ratelimit > blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg)) {
+blkcg_bps:
+ blkcg_update_bandwidth(blkcg);
+ dirty_ratelimit = blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(blkcg);
+ task_ratelimit = dirty_ratelimit;
+ }
+
max_pause = bdi_max_pause(bdi, bdi_dirty);
min_pause = bdi_min_pause(bdi, max_pause,
task_ratelimit, dirty_ratelimit,
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h 2012-03-28 15:36:16.414093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h 2012-03-28 15:39:46.730088815 +0800
@@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ struct blkio_cgroup {
struct hlist_head blkg_list;
struct list_head policy_list; /* list of blkio_policy_node */
struct percpu_counter nr_dirtied;
+ unsigned long bw_time_stamp;
+ unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
+ unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
+ unsigned long long buffered_write_bps;
};
struct blkio_group_stats {
@@ -217,6 +221,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blkcg_weight(
{
return blkcg->weight;
}
+static inline uint64_t blkcg_buffered_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return blkcg->buffered_write_bps;
+}
+static inline unsigned long blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return blkcg->dirty_ratelimit;
+}
typedef void (blkio_unlink_group_fn) (void *key, struct blkio_group *blkg);
@@ -272,6 +284,14 @@ static inline unsigned int blkcg_weight(
{
return BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT;
}
+static inline uint64_t blkcg_buffered_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline unsigned long blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 12:13 [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages() Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-cgroup: move blk-cgroup.h in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-cgroup: account dirtied pages Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth weight Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit interface Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages() Vivek Goyal
2012-03-28 21:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-28 22:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 22:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-29 2:48 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-03-29 2:48 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-03-29 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29 1:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-29 1:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 4:16 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-04-01 4:16 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-04-01 8:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 8:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 20:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-01 20:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 8:00 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-03 14:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 14:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120328131153.382173637@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.