From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:13:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328131153.548884752@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120328121308.568545879@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-io-controller-trace.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5871 bytes --]
test-blkio-cgroup.sh
#!/bin/sh
mount /dev/sda7 /fs
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/blkcg_dirty_ratelimit/enable
rmdir /cgroup/buffered_write
mkdir /cgroup/buffered_write
echo $$ > /cgroup/buffered_write/tasks
echo $((2<<20)) > /cgroup/buffered_write/blkio.throttle.buffered_write_bps
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero1 bs=1M count=100 &
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero2 bs=1M count=100 &
run 1:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 97.8103 s, 1.1 MB/s
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 97.9835 s, 1.1 MB/s
run 2:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 98.5704 s, 1.1 MB/s
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 98.6268 s, 1.1 MB/s
average bps: 100MiB / 98.248s = 1.02MiB/s
run 1 trace:
dd-3485 [000] .... 658.737063: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1932 dirty_ratelimit=1064 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [000] .... 658.976945: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2000 dirty_ratelimit=1076 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 659.212830: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2440 dirty_ratelimit=992 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.470651: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1860 dirty_ratelimit=1044 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.714535: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2360 dirty_ratelimit=976 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.976381: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1832 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.222254: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2340 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.484089: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1464 dirty_ratelimit=1164 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1352
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.701984: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2640 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.947856: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1948 dirty_ratelimit=1064 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.187727: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2000 dirty_ratelimit=1076 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.423572: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2440 dirty_ratelimit=992 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.681431: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2232 dirty_ratelimit=952 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=908
dd-3485 [002] .... 661.949290: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1432 dirty_ratelimit=1156 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1356
dd-3485 [002] .... 662.169176: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2616 dirty_ratelimit=1032 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.417016: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2320 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=908
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.678903: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1464 dirty_ratelimit=1164 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1352
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.896764: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2640 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [002] .... 663.142644: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2340 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
It looks good enough as a proposal. Could be made more accurate if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:16.426093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:47.906092485 +0800
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ static void blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit
ratelimit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit = (blkcg->dirty_ratelimit + ratelimit) / 2 + 1;
+ trace_blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(bps, dirty_rate,
+ blkcg->dirty_ratelimit, ratelimit);
}
void blkcg_update_bandwidth(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-03-28 14:25:16.026180561 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-03-28 15:36:47.906092485 +0800
@@ -249,6 +249,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(global_dirty_state,
#define KBps(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
+TRACE_EVENT(blkcg_dirty_ratelimit,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long bps,
+ unsigned long dirty_rate,
+ unsigned long dirty_ratelimit,
+ unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bps, dirty_rate, dirty_ratelimit, balanced_dirty_ratelimit),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, kbps)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty_rate)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty_ratelimit)
+ __field(unsigned long, balanced_dirty_ratelimit)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->kbps = bps >> 10;
+ __entry->dirty_rate = KBps(dirty_rate);
+ __entry->dirty_ratelimit = KBps(dirty_ratelimit);
+ __entry->balanced_dirty_ratelimit =
+ KBps(balanced_dirty_ratelimit);
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("kbps=%lu dirty_rate=%lu "
+ "dirty_ratelimit=%lu "
+ "balanced_dirty_ratelimit=%lu",
+ __entry->kbps,
+ __entry->dirty_rate,
+ __entry->dirty_ratelimit,
+ __entry->balanced_dirty_ratelimit
+ )
+);
+
TRACE_EVENT(bdi_dirty_ratelimit,
TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:13:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328131153.548884752@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120328121308.568545879@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-io-controller-trace.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5871 bytes --]
test-blkio-cgroup.sh
#!/bin/sh
mount /dev/sda7 /fs
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/blkcg_dirty_ratelimit/enable
rmdir /cgroup/buffered_write
mkdir /cgroup/buffered_write
echo $$ > /cgroup/buffered_write/tasks
echo $((2<<20)) > /cgroup/buffered_write/blkio.throttle.buffered_write_bps
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero1 bs=1M count=100 &
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero2 bs=1M count=100 &
run 1:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 97.8103 s, 1.1 MB/s
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 97.9835 s, 1.1 MB/s
run 2:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 98.5704 s, 1.1 MB/s
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 98.6268 s, 1.1 MB/s
average bps: 100MiB / 98.248s = 1.02MiB/s
run 1 trace:
dd-3485 [000] .... 658.737063: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1932 dirty_ratelimit=1064 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [000] .... 658.976945: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2000 dirty_ratelimit=1076 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 659.212830: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2440 dirty_ratelimit=992 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.470651: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1860 dirty_ratelimit=1044 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.714535: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2360 dirty_ratelimit=976 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.976381: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1832 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.222254: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2340 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.484089: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1464 dirty_ratelimit=1164 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1352
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.701984: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2640 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.947856: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1948 dirty_ratelimit=1064 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.187727: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2000 dirty_ratelimit=1076 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.423572: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2440 dirty_ratelimit=992 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.681431: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2232 dirty_ratelimit=952 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=908
dd-3485 [002] .... 661.949290: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1432 dirty_ratelimit=1156 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1356
dd-3485 [002] .... 662.169176: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2616 dirty_ratelimit=1032 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.417016: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2320 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=908
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.678903: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1464 dirty_ratelimit=1164 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1352
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.896764: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2640 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [002] .... 663.142644: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2340 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
It looks good enough as a proposal. Could be made more accurate if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:16.426093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:47.906092485 +0800
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ static void blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit
ratelimit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit = (blkcg->dirty_ratelimit + ratelimit) / 2 + 1;
+ trace_blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(bps, dirty_rate,
+ blkcg->dirty_ratelimit, ratelimit);
}
void blkcg_update_bandwidth(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-03-28 14:25:16.026180561 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-03-28 15:36:47.906092485 +0800
@@ -249,6 +249,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(global_dirty_state,
#define KBps(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
+TRACE_EVENT(blkcg_dirty_ratelimit,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long bps,
+ unsigned long dirty_rate,
+ unsigned long dirty_ratelimit,
+ unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bps, dirty_rate, dirty_ratelimit, balanced_dirty_ratelimit),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, kbps)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty_rate)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty_ratelimit)
+ __field(unsigned long, balanced_dirty_ratelimit)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->kbps = bps >> 10;
+ __entry->dirty_rate = KBps(dirty_rate);
+ __entry->dirty_ratelimit = KBps(dirty_ratelimit);
+ __entry->balanced_dirty_ratelimit =
+ KBps(balanced_dirty_ratelimit);
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("kbps=%lu dirty_rate=%lu "
+ "dirty_ratelimit=%lu "
+ "balanced_dirty_ratelimit=%lu",
+ __entry->kbps,
+ __entry->dirty_rate,
+ __entry->dirty_ratelimit,
+ __entry->balanced_dirty_ratelimit
+ )
+);
+
TRACE_EVENT(bdi_dirty_ratelimit,
TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:13:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328131153.548884752@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120328121308.568545879@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-io-controller-trace.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5568 bytes --]
test-blkio-cgroup.sh
#!/bin/sh
mount /dev/sda7 /fs
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/balance_dirty_pages/enable
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/writeback/blkcg_dirty_ratelimit/enable
rmdir /cgroup/buffered_write
mkdir /cgroup/buffered_write
echo $$ > /cgroup/buffered_write/tasks
echo $((2<<20)) > /cgroup/buffered_write/blkio.throttle.buffered_write_bps
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero1 bs=1M count=100 &
dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero2 bs=1M count=100 &
run 1:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 97.8103 s, 1.1 MB/s
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 97.9835 s, 1.1 MB/s
run 2:
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 98.5704 s, 1.1 MB/s
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 98.6268 s, 1.1 MB/s
average bps: 100MiB / 98.248s = 1.02MiB/s
run 1 trace:
dd-3485 [000] .... 658.737063: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1932 dirty_ratelimit=1064 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [000] .... 658.976945: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2000 dirty_ratelimit=1076 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 659.212830: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2440 dirty_ratelimit=992 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.470651: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1860 dirty_ratelimit=1044 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.714535: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2360 dirty_ratelimit=976 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
dd-3485 [002] .... 659.976381: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1832 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1088
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.222254: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2340 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.484089: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1464 dirty_ratelimit=1164 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1352
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.701984: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2640 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 660.947856: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1948 dirty_ratelimit=1064 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.187727: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2000 dirty_ratelimit=1076 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1084
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.423572: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2440 dirty_ratelimit=992 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 661.681431: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2232 dirty_ratelimit=952 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=908
dd-3485 [002] .... 661.949290: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1432 dirty_ratelimit=1156 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1356
dd-3485 [002] .... 662.169176: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2616 dirty_ratelimit=1032 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.417016: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2320 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=908
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.678903: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=1464 dirty_ratelimit=1164 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=1352
dd-3485 [000] .... 662.896764: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2640 dirty_ratelimit=1036 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=900
dd-3485 [002] .... 663.142644: blkcg_dirty_ratelimit: kbps=2048 dirty_rate=2340 dirty_ratelimit=972 balanced_dirty_ratelimit=904
It looks good enough as a proposal. Could be made more accurate if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:16.426093131 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2012-03-28 15:36:47.906092485 +0800
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ static void blkcg_update_dirty_ratelimit
ratelimit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
blkcg->dirty_ratelimit = (blkcg->dirty_ratelimit + ratelimit) / 2 + 1;
+ trace_blkcg_dirty_ratelimit(bps, dirty_rate,
+ blkcg->dirty_ratelimit, ratelimit);
}
void blkcg_update_bandwidth(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-03-28 14:25:16.026180561 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-03-28 15:36:47.906092485 +0800
@@ -249,6 +249,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(global_dirty_state,
#define KBps(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
+TRACE_EVENT(blkcg_dirty_ratelimit,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long bps,
+ unsigned long dirty_rate,
+ unsigned long dirty_ratelimit,
+ unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bps, dirty_rate, dirty_ratelimit, balanced_dirty_ratelimit),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, kbps)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty_rate)
+ __field(unsigned long, dirty_ratelimit)
+ __field(unsigned long, balanced_dirty_ratelimit)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->kbps = bps >> 10;
+ __entry->dirty_rate = KBps(dirty_rate);
+ __entry->dirty_ratelimit = KBps(dirty_ratelimit);
+ __entry->balanced_dirty_ratelimit =
+ KBps(balanced_dirty_ratelimit);
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("kbps=%lu dirty_rate=%lu "
+ "dirty_ratelimit=%lu "
+ "balanced_dirty_ratelimit=%lu",
+ __entry->kbps,
+ __entry->dirty_rate,
+ __entry->dirty_ratelimit,
+ __entry->balanced_dirty_ratelimit
+ )
+);
+
TRACE_EVENT(bdi_dirty_ratelimit,
TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 12:13 [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages() Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-cgroup: move blk-cgroup.h in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-cgroup: account dirtied pages Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth weight Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit interface Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages() Vivek Goyal
2012-03-28 21:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-28 22:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 22:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-29 2:48 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-03-29 2:48 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-03-29 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29 1:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-03-29 1:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 4:16 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-04-01 4:16 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-04-01 8:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 8:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 20:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-01 20:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 8:00 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-03 14:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 14:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120328131153.548884752@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.