From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZ8yH1ZSG-nQ9dLm0TipHS-jZDuxwqohUC=LGH9V-5q4w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:15:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZ8yH1ZSG-nQ9dLm0TipHS-jZDuxwqohUC=LGH9V-5q4w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZ8yH1ZSG-nQ9dLm0TipHS-jZDuxwqohUC=LGH9V-5q4w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:15:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZ8yH1ZSG-nQ9dLm0TipHS-jZDuxwqohUC=LGH9V-5q4w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZ8yH1ZSG-nQ9dLm0TipHS-jZDuxwqohUC=LGH9V-5q4w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-15 9:52 [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h Mark Brown
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` [ORLinux] " Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-04-17 18:49 ` Tony Luck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-04 15:54 Mark Brown
2012-02-04 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-04 17:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-04 17:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-04 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=grant@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@lists.openrisc.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.