From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
>
> That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
> included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:08:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
>
> That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
> included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
>
> That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
> included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:08:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
>
> That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
> included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@openrisc.net,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze,
> > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say.
>
> That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers
> included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually.
Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-12 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-15 9:52 [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h Mark Brown
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` [ORLinux] " Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 7:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-04-17 18:49 ` Tony Luck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-04 15:54 Mark Brown
2012-02-04 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-04 17:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-04 17:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-04 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-04 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-25 7:33 Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-25 8:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-26 7:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 23:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-25 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=grant@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@lists.openrisc.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.