From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use pinctrl driver
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:08:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420010845.GV16641@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416033519.GA17173@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
On 11:35 Mon 16 Apr , Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 03:37:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:03:16PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > ...
> > > For MX3 and MX5, before their pinctrl driver are available, user may
> > > need to define a dummy in dt to avoid such an error.
> > >
> > That is insane, and will not work.
> >
> > 1) We do not have device tree support for MX3 yet.
> > 2) It's not practical to add dummy entries in dt to avoid the error.
> > 3) There are still so many non-dt board files support in the tree.
> > How will they work with that?
> >
> > My suggestion is to not make it an error but a dev_dbg, assuming that
> > the pins are already set up by platform code if we do not find the
> > entry from pinctrl system. We can take it as a transition solution,
> > and turn the dev_dbg back to error when all the users of the device
> > driver are converted to device tree.
> >
> My thinking is let pinctrl core handle dummy state as regulator subsystem
> and does not depend on dt.
> Linus, Stephen, any comment?
agreed with Shawn
this is insane if you can an error you do need to report it
I get the same issue on at91 and I'm going to make the pinctrl mandatory for DT
only
Best Regards,
J.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use pinctrl driver
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:08:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420010845.GV16641@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416033519.GA17173@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
On 11:35 Mon 16 Apr , Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 03:37:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:03:16PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > ...
> > > For MX3 and MX5, before their pinctrl driver are available, user may
> > > need to define a dummy in dt to avoid such an error.
> > >
> > That is insane, and will not work.
> >
> > 1) We do not have device tree support for MX3 yet.
> > 2) It's not practical to add dummy entries in dt to avoid the error.
> > 3) There are still so many non-dt board files support in the tree.
> > How will they work with that?
> >
> > My suggestion is to not make it an error but a dev_dbg, assuming that
> > the pins are already set up by platform code if we do not find the
> > entry from pinctrl system. We can take it as a transition solution,
> > and turn the dev_dbg back to error when all the users of the device
> > driver are converted to device tree.
> >
> My thinking is let pinctrl core handle dummy state as regulator subsystem
> and does not depend on dt.
> Linus, Stephen, any comment?
agreed with Shawn
this is insane if you can an error you do need to report it
I get the same issue on at91 and I'm going to make the pinctrl mandatory for DT
only
Best Regards,
J.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use pinctrl driver
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:08:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420010845.GV16641@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416033519.GA17173@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
On 11:35 Mon 16 Apr , Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 03:37:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:03:16PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > ...
> > > For MX3 and MX5, before their pinctrl driver are available, user may
> > > need to define a dummy in dt to avoid such an error.
> > >
> > That is insane, and will not work.
> >
> > 1) We do not have device tree support for MX3 yet.
> > 2) It's not practical to add dummy entries in dt to avoid the error.
> > 3) There are still so many non-dt board files support in the tree.
> > How will they work with that?
> >
> > My suggestion is to not make it an error but a dev_dbg, assuming that
> > the pins are already set up by platform code if we do not find the
> > entry from pinctrl system. We can take it as a transition solution,
> > and turn the dev_dbg back to error when all the users of the device
> > driver are converted to device tree.
> >
> My thinking is let pinctrl core handle dummy state as regulator subsystem
> and does not depend on dt.
> Linus, Stephen, any comment?
agreed with Shawn
this is insane if you can an error you do need to report it
I get the same issue on at91 and I'm going to make the pinctrl mandatory for DT
only
Best Regards,
J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 16:18 [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: add imx pinctrl core driver Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: add imx6q pinctrl driver Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-17 20:12 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-17 20:12 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-18 3:40 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-18 3:40 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use " Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 16:18 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-14 13:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-14 13:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-15 4:03 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-15 4:03 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-15 7:37 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-15 7:37 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-15 7:37 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-16 3:35 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-16 3:35 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-16 3:35 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-20 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2012-04-20 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-04-20 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-04-24 8:23 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-24 8:23 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-24 8:46 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-24 8:46 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-24 8:46 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-17 20:23 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-17 20:23 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-13 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: add imx pinctrl core driver Dong Aisheng
2012-04-13 18:17 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-14 13:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-14 13:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-14 13:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-15 3:49 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-15 3:49 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-15 14:17 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-15 14:17 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-15 14:45 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-15 14:45 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-15 17:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-15 17:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-16 1:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-16 1:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-16 1:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-16 18:01 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-16 18:01 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-16 3:47 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-16 3:47 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-16 3:47 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-16 3:46 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-16 3:46 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-17 9:57 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-17 9:57 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-17 12:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 12:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-18 3:38 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-18 3:38 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-17 20:58 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-17 20:58 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-18 7:19 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-18 7:19 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-04-18 18:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-18 18:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-19 15:28 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-19 15:28 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120420010845.GV16641@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.