From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:54:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424075426.GP24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120424013841.GB26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> > >> Let me try last time. ?What about having a late_initcall hook in
> > >> machine_desc?
> > >
> > > Also fine with me.
> > >
> >
> > Shall I add Shawn's patch to my imx cpuidle patchset or should the
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c and arch.h changes be submitted separately?
> > If separately, Shawn, did you want to submit this patch or should I?
> >
> Strange. Russell is not in the Cc list. I remember I added Russell
> into Cc when I propose the idea. Added him again.
I didn't see any message in this thread cc'd to me, but that's not to
say I hadn't already read this patch. I don't have any comment against
it, but I do wonder how often this hook would be used.
We do seem to have quite a number of late_initcall()s in arch/arm/mach-*,
so it seems to be a good idea - provided someone's willing to convert all
those users of late_initcall()s.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:54:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424075426.GP24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120424013841.GB26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> > >> Let me try last time. What about having a late_initcall hook in
> > >> machine_desc?
> > >
> > > Also fine with me.
> > >
> >
> > Shall I add Shawn's patch to my imx cpuidle patchset or should the
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c and arch.h changes be submitted separately?
> > If separately, Shawn, did you want to submit this patch or should I?
> >
> Strange. Russell is not in the Cc list. I remember I added Russell
> into Cc when I propose the idea. Added him again.
I didn't see any message in this thread cc'd to me, but that's not to
say I hadn't already read this patch. I don't have any comment against
it, but I do wonder how often this hook would be used.
We do seem to have quite a number of late_initcall()s in arch/arm/mach-*,
so it seems to be a good idea - provided someone's willing to convert all
those users of late_initcall()s.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 23:50 [PATCH 0/3] Add imx cpuidle Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:50 ` Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:50 ` Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2012-04-16 23:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2012-04-17 7:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 7:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 13:54 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-17 13:54 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-17 14:13 ` Christian Robottom Reis
2012-04-17 14:13 ` Christian Robottom Reis
2012-04-17 14:32 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-17 14:32 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-17 17:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 17:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 19:32 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-17 19:32 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-19 4:18 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-19 4:18 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-19 6:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-19 6:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-20 2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-20 2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 4:44 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-23 4:44 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-23 5:18 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 5:18 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 6:27 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-23 6:27 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-23 6:53 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 6:53 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 6:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-23 6:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-23 7:10 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 7:10 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-23 7:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-23 7:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-23 15:45 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-23 15:45 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-24 1:38 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-24 1:38 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-24 7:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-04-24 7:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-24 8:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-24 8:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-24 15:40 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-24 15:40 ` Rob Lee
2012-04-24 19:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-24 19:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-25 2:06 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-25 2:06 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-16 23:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: imx: Add imx5 cpuidle driver Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:50 ` Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx: Add imx6q " Robert Lee
2012-04-16 23:50 ` Robert Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120424075426.GP24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.