From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"
<linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
"cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker
<fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>,
Han Ying <yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V"
<aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyuki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/9 v2] cgroup: avoid attaching task to a cgroup under rmdir()
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:33:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120427203336.GM26595@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120427203159.GL26595-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:31:59PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:02:22PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > attach_task() is done under cgroup_mutex() but ->pre_destroy() callback
> > in rmdir() isn't called under cgroup_mutex().
> >
> > It's better to avoid attaching a task to a cgroup which
> > is under pre_destroy(). Considering memcg, the attached task may
> > increase resource usage after memcg's pre_destroy() confirms that
> > memcg is empty. This is not good.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
>
> Hmm... once memcg's pre_destroy() can't fail, I think what we should
> do is marking a cgroup DEAD before calling pre_destroy() and the
> existing cgroup_is_removed() check should be enough. Patches upto
> this point already make ->pre_destroy() not fail, right?
Ooh, I was confused about patch order. This patch, probably with the
update suggested by Frederic looks good as an interim solution for
now.
Thanks.
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Han Ying <yinghan@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/9 v2] cgroup: avoid attaching task to a cgroup under rmdir()
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:33:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120427203336.GM26595@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120427203159.GL26595@google.com>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:31:59PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:02:22PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > attach_task() is done under cgroup_mutex() but ->pre_destroy() callback
> > in rmdir() isn't called under cgroup_mutex().
> >
> > It's better to avoid attaching a task to a cgroup which
> > is under pre_destroy(). Considering memcg, the attached task may
> > increase resource usage after memcg's pre_destroy() confirms that
> > memcg is empty. This is not good.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Hmm... once memcg's pre_destroy() can't fail, I think what we should
> do is marking a cgroup DEAD before calling pre_destroy() and the
> existing cgroup_is_removed() check should be enough. Patches upto
> this point already make ->pre_destroy() not fail, right?
Ooh, I was confused about patch order. This patch, probably with the
update suggested by Frederic looks good as an interim solution for
now.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Han Ying <yinghan@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/9 v2] cgroup: avoid attaching task to a cgroup under rmdir()
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:33:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120427203336.GM26595@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120427203159.GL26595@google.com>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:31:59PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:02:22PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > attach_task() is done under cgroup_mutex() but ->pre_destroy() callback
> > in rmdir() isn't called under cgroup_mutex().
> >
> > It's better to avoid attaching a task to a cgroup which
> > is under pre_destroy(). Considering memcg, the attached task may
> > increase resource usage after memcg's pre_destroy() confirms that
> > memcg is empty. This is not good.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Hmm... once memcg's pre_destroy() can't fail, I think what we should
> do is marking a cgroup DEAD before calling pre_destroy() and the
> existing cgroup_is_removed() check should be enough. Patches upto
> this point already make ->pre_destroy() not fail, right?
Ooh, I was confused about patch order. This patch, probably with the
update suggested by Frederic looks good as an interim solution for
now.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-27 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 5:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/7 v2] memcg: prevent failure in pre_destroy() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4F9A327A.6050409-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 5:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7 v2] temporal compile-fix in linux-next KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4F9A3364.4090009-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-30 8:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 8:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 8:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27 5:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7 v2] res_counter: add res_counter_uncharge_until() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 17:08 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4F9AD28C.60508-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 23:51 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:51 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:51 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
[not found] ` <4F9A343F.7020409-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 18:18 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:18 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:18 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120427181840.GH26595-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 23:51 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:51 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:51 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 6:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9 v2] memcg: don't uncharge in mem_cgroup_move_account KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9 v2] cgroup: avoid creating new cgroup under a cgroup being destroyed KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 17:18 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4F9A36DE.30301-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120427204035.GN26595-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 0:20 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:20 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:20 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 2:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-28 2:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-28 9:31 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 9:31 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-28 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-28 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7 v2] memcg: prevent failure in pre_destroy() Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:16 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120427181642.GG26595-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 23:48 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:48 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:48 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
[not found] ` <CABEgKgrir3PBGqm_9FmYsZTiFqsZ=Cdt5iZDu5WcOHPtZuEbFg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-28 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-28 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20120428161358.GA13010-VqjxzfR4DlwKmadIfiO5sKVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-29 6:03 ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-29 6:03 ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-29 6:03 ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-27 5:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7 v2] memcg: fix error code in hugetlb_force_memcg_empty() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-30 8:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 8:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27 5:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7 v2] memcg: use res_counter_uncharge_until in move_parent KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 17:16 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4F9AD455.9030306-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 18:26 ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 18:26 ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 18:26 ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-27 23:58 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:58 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:58 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
[not found] ` <4F9A34B2.8080103-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 23:59 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 23:59 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-30 9:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 9:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 9:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27 5:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9 v2] move charges to root at rmdir if use_hierarchy is unset KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 5:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4F9A359C.10107-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 19:12 ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 19:12 ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 19:12 ` Ying Han
[not found] ` <CALWz4ixHGCqfWh1U+JyiJWTkGmCDtXQy1vbHRjrHaU_pOgGuBw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 0:01 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:01 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:01 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-30 9:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 9:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-30 9:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27 6:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9 v2] cgroup: avoid attaching task to a cgroup under rmdir() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 10:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-27 10:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <20120427103927.GA3514-oHC15RC7JGTpAmv0O++HtFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 0:06 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:06 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:06 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
[not found] ` <4F9A366E.9020307-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 20:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:31 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120427203159.GL26595-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 20:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-04-27 20:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 6:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9 v2] memcg: never return error at pre_destroy() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 6:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 21:28 ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 21:28 ` Ying Han
[not found] ` <CALWz4iyiM-CFgVaHiE1Lgd1ZwJzHwY3tx9XX6HeDPUV_wVPAtQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 0:25 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:25 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 0:25 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-30 17:02 ` Ying Han
2012-04-30 17:02 ` Ying Han
2012-05-01 22:28 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-01 22:28 ` Suleiman Souhlal
[not found] ` <CABCjUKBhNkGf2QHzONMod3HmHgS-HxB5hUxpfJFHUG-eBkYBRw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-02 3:34 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-05-02 3:34 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-05-02 3:34 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120427203336.GM26595@google.com \
--to=tj-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyuki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.