All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] mm: remove sparsemem allocation details from the bootmem allocator
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:19:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507181941.GF19417@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336390672-14421-11-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> alloc_bootmem_section() derives allocation area constraints from the
> specified sparsemem section.  This is a bit specific for a generic
> memory allocator like bootmem, though, so move it over to sparsemem.
> 
> As __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() already retries failed allocations
> with relaxed area constraints, the fallback code in sparsemem.c can be
> removed and the code becomes a bit more compact overall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

For 03-10

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks for doing this.  While at it, maybe we can clear up the naming
mess there?  I don't hate __s too much but the bootmem allocator
brings it to a whole new level.  :(

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] mm: remove sparsemem allocation details from the bootmem allocator
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:19:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507181941.GF19417@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336390672-14421-11-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> alloc_bootmem_section() derives allocation area constraints from the
> specified sparsemem section.  This is a bit specific for a generic
> memory allocator like bootmem, though, so move it over to sparsemem.
> 
> As __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() already retries failed allocations
> with relaxed area constraints, the fallback code in sparsemem.c can be
> removed and the code becomes a bit more compact overall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

For 03-10

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks for doing this.  While at it, maybe we can clear up the naming
mess there?  I don't hate __s too much but the bootmem allocator
brings it to a whole new level.  :(

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-07 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07 11:37 [patch 00/10] (no)bootmem bits for 3.5 Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 01/10] mm: bootmem: fix checking the bitmap when finally freeing bootmem Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 18:07   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:07     ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 02/10] mm: bootmem: remove redundant offset check " Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 18:08   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:08     ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 03/10] mm: bootmem: rename alloc_bootmem_core to alloc_bootmem_bdata Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 04/10] mm: bootmem: split out goal-to-node mapping from goal dropping Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 05/10] mm: bootmem: allocate in order node+goal, goal, node, anywhere Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 06/10] mm: bootmem: unify allocation policy of (non-)panicking node allocations Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 07/10] mm: nobootmem: panic on node-specific allocation failure Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 19:17   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 19:17     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 08/10] mm: nobootmem: unify allocation policy of (non-)panicking node allocations Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 19:23   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 19:23     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 09/10] mm: bootmem: pass pgdat instead of pgdat->bdata down the stack Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 10/10] mm: remove sparsemem allocation details from the bootmem allocator Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 18:19   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-05-07 18:19     ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:21     ` David Miller
2012-05-07 18:21       ` David Miller
2012-05-10 21:44   ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-10 21:44     ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-15 11:47     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-15 11:47       ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 20:41 ` [patch 00/10] (no)bootmem bits for 3.5 Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-07 20:41   ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-07 22:01   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 22:01     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-08 17:57     ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-08 17:57       ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-09 17:35       ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 17:35         ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 17:54         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-09 17:54           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-09 18:08           ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 18:08             ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120507181941.GF19417@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.