From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] (no)bootmem bits for 3.5
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 00:01:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507220142.GA1202@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120507204113.GD10521@merkur.ravnborg.org>
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Johannes.
>
> > here are some (no)bootmem fixes and cleanups for 3.5. Most of it is
> > unifying allocation behaviour across bootmem and nobootmem when it
> > comes to respecting the specified allocation address goal and numa.
> >
> > But also refactoring the codebases of the two bootmem APIs so that we
> > can think about sharing code between them again.
>
> Could you check up on CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM use in bootmem.c too?
> x86 no longer uses bootmem.c
> avr define it - but to n.
>
> So no-one is actually using this anymore.
> I have sent patches to remove it from Kconfig for both x86 and avr.
>
> I looked briefly at cleaning up bootmem.c myslef - but I felt not
> familiar enough with the code to do the cleanup.
>
> I did not check your patchset - but based on the shortlog you
> did not kill HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM.
It was used on x86-32 numa to try all bootmem allocations from node 0
first (see only remaining definition of bootmem_arch_preferred_node),
which AFAICS nobootmem no longer respects.
Shouldn't this be fixed instead?
But yeah, we can remove the bootmem.c parts, I think.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] (no)bootmem bits for 3.5
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 00:01:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507220142.GA1202@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120507204113.GD10521@merkur.ravnborg.org>
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Johannes.
>
> > here are some (no)bootmem fixes and cleanups for 3.5. Most of it is
> > unifying allocation behaviour across bootmem and nobootmem when it
> > comes to respecting the specified allocation address goal and numa.
> >
> > But also refactoring the codebases of the two bootmem APIs so that we
> > can think about sharing code between them again.
>
> Could you check up on CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM use in bootmem.c too?
> x86 no longer uses bootmem.c
> avr define it - but to n.
>
> So no-one is actually using this anymore.
> I have sent patches to remove it from Kconfig for both x86 and avr.
>
> I looked briefly at cleaning up bootmem.c myslef - but I felt not
> familiar enough with the code to do the cleanup.
>
> I did not check your patchset - but based on the shortlog you
> did not kill HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM.
It was used on x86-32 numa to try all bootmem allocations from node 0
first (see only remaining definition of bootmem_arch_preferred_node),
which AFAICS nobootmem no longer respects.
Shouldn't this be fixed instead?
But yeah, we can remove the bootmem.c parts, I think.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-07 11:37 [patch 00/10] (no)bootmem bits for 3.5 Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 01/10] mm: bootmem: fix checking the bitmap when finally freeing bootmem Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 18:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 02/10] mm: bootmem: remove redundant offset check " Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 03/10] mm: bootmem: rename alloc_bootmem_core to alloc_bootmem_bdata Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 04/10] mm: bootmem: split out goal-to-node mapping from goal dropping Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 05/10] mm: bootmem: allocate in order node+goal, goal, node, anywhere Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 06/10] mm: bootmem: unify allocation policy of (non-)panicking node allocations Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 07/10] mm: nobootmem: panic on node-specific allocation failure Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 19:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 19:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 08/10] mm: nobootmem: unify allocation policy of (non-)panicking node allocations Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 19:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 19:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 09/10] mm: bootmem: pass pgdat instead of pgdat->bdata down the stack Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` [patch 10/10] mm: remove sparsemem allocation details from the bootmem allocator Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 18:21 ` David Miller
2012-05-07 18:21 ` David Miller
2012-05-10 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-10 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-15 11:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-15 11:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-07 20:41 ` [patch 00/10] (no)bootmem bits for 3.5 Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-07 20:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-07 22:01 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2012-05-07 22:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-08 17:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-08 17:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-05-09 17:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 17:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 17:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-09 17:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-09 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120507220142.GA1202@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.