From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void *
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 13:19:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509201918.GA7288@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA33DF6.8060107@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:24:54AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 12:23 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>
> > On 05/03/2012 08:32 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/3/12 2:40 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> We should use zs_handle instead of void * to avoid any
> >>> confusion. Without this, users may just treat zs_malloc return value as
> >>> a pointer and try to deference it.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Dan Magenheimer<dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
> >>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan@kernel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c | 8 ++++----
> >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 8 ++++----
> >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 2 +-
> >>> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 28
> >>> ++++++++++++++--------------
> >>> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> >>> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> This was a long pending change. Thanks!
> >
> >
> > The reason I hadn't done it before is that it introduces a checkpatch
> > warning:
> >
> > WARNING: do not add new typedefs
> > #303: FILE: drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h:19:
> > +typedef void * zs_handle;
> >
>
>
> Yes. I did it but I think we are (a) of chapter 5: Typedefs in Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> (a) totally opaque objects (where the typedef is actively used to _hide_
> what the object is).
>
> No?
No.
Don't add new typedefs to the kernel. Just use a structure if you need
to.
Vague "handles" are almost never what you want to do in Linux, sorry, I
can't take this patch.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void *
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 13:19:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509201918.GA7288@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA33DF6.8060107@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:24:54AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 12:23 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>
> > On 05/03/2012 08:32 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/3/12 2:40 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> We should use zs_handle instead of void * to avoid any
> >>> confusion. Without this, users may just treat zs_malloc return value as
> >>> a pointer and try to deference it.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Dan Magenheimer<dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
> >>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan@kernel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c | 8 ++++----
> >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 8 ++++----
> >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 2 +-
> >>> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 28
> >>> ++++++++++++++--------------
> >>> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> >>> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> This was a long pending change. Thanks!
> >
> >
> > The reason I hadn't done it before is that it introduces a checkpatch
> > warning:
> >
> > WARNING: do not add new typedefs
> > #303: FILE: drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h:19:
> > +typedef void * zs_handle;
> >
>
>
> Yes. I did it but I think we are (a) of chapter 5: Typedefs in Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> (a) totally opaque objects (where the typedef is actively used to _hide_
> what the object is).
>
> No?
No.
Don't add new typedefs to the kernel. Just use a structure if you need
to.
Vague "handles" are almost never what you want to do in Linux, sorry, I
can't take this patch.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 6:40 [PATCH 1/4] zsmalloc: rename zspage_order with zspage_pages Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 6:40 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 6:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] zsmalloc: add/fix function comment Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 6:40 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:19 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 13:19 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 6:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void * Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 6:40 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 13:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 15:23 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-03 15:23 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-04 2:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-04 2:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-07 15:01 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-07 15:01 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-09 20:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-05-09 20:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 2:03 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 2:03 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 14:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-10 14:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-10 14:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 14:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 14:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 14:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 15:00 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 15:00 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 15:11 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-10 15:11 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-10 15:19 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 15:19 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 15:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 15:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 16:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 16:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 16:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 16:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 17:24 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 17:24 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 17:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-10 17:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-10 23:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 23:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 23:50 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-10 23:50 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11 0:14 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 0:14 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 16:31 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11 16:31 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11 19:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-11 19:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-11 21:49 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-11 21:49 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-14 2:26 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14 2:26 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 19:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-11 19:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-14 2:18 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14 2:18 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 1:57 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-15 1:57 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-15 2:21 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 2:21 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 15:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-15 15:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-16 1:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-16 1:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-16 11:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-16 11:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-03 6:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] zsmalloc: zsmalloc: align cache line size Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 6:40 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:58 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 13:58 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-04 2:27 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-04 2:27 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-07 7:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-05-07 7:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-05-07 12:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-07 12:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-08 1:34 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-08 1:34 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-08 14:00 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-08 14:00 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-09 0:58 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-09 0:58 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-09 3:08 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-09 3:08 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-09 4:07 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-09 4:07 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 0:03 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11 0:03 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11 0:25 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 0:25 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 19:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-11 19:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-14 1:55 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14 1:55 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 15:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-15 15:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-16 1:44 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-16 1:44 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] zsmalloc: rename zspage_order with zspage_pages Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 13:18 ` Nitin Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509201918.GA7288@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.